Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 5113 Del
Judgement Date : 9 December, 2009
15
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ MAC.APP.No.486/2008
Date of Decision: 9th December, 2009
%
TILAK RAJ LAMBA & ORS. ..... Appellants
Through : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Deval,
Adv. for R-1 and 2.
versus
ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. ..... Respondent
Through : Mr. R.N. Sharma, Adv.
CORAM :-
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA
1. Whether Reporters of Local papers may YES
be allowed to see the Judgment?
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? YES
3. Whether the judgment should be YES
reported in the Digest?
JUDGMENT (Oral)
1. The appellants have challenged the award of the
learned Tribunal whereby compensation of Rs.2,52,040/- has
been awarded to them. The appellants seek enhancement of
the award amount.
2. The accident dated 23rd January, 2006 resulted in the
death of Kapil Lamba. The deceased was survived by his
parents who filed the claim petition before the learned
Tribunal
3. The deceased was aged 24 years at the time of the
accident and was carrying on his own business in the name
and style of M/s KAPS.
4. It was claimed that the deceased was earning
Rs.12,000/- to Rs.16,000/- per month. The income was
sought to be proved by the Income Tax Return - Ex.PW1/5
for the assessment year 2006-07 according to which the
income from the business was Rs.1,39,880/- but this return
was filed after the death of the deceased. The Income Tax
Returns for the previous three years were also placed on
record but there is no income from business in those returns.
The learned Tribunal, therefore, took the income of the
deceased at the time of the accident to be Rs.3,926/- per
month on the basis of minimum wages. The increase in
minimum wages were taken into consideration and the
income of the deceased for computation of compensation
was taken at Rs.5,889/- per month. The learned Tribunal
deducted 1/2 towards personal expenses of the deceased
and applied the multiplier of 8 to compute the loss of
dependency at Rs.2,12,040/-. Rs.10,000/- has been awarded
towards funeral expenses and Rs.30,000/- towards loss of
love and affection. The total compensation awarded is
Rs.2,52,040/-.
5. The learned counsel for the appellant has urged the
following grounds at the time of hearing of this appeal:-
(i) The income of the deceased be taken to be
Rs.1,39,880/- as per the Income Tax Return -
Ex.PW1/5.
(ii) The multiplier be enhanced from 8 to 11.
(iii) The compensation be awarded for loss of estate.
6. With respect to the income of the deceased, Ex.PW1/5
cannot be relied upon as the same was filed after the death
of the deceased and it has not been corroborated by any
evidence of the proof of income of the deceased such as the
balance sheet and profit/loss account. The Income Tax
Returns for previous three years do not show any income of
the deceased from business or profession. However,
considering that the deceased was holding a diploma from
NIIT and was carrying on the business and was filing the
Income Tax Return for the last three years before his death,
the income of the deceased is taken to be Rs.7,500/- instead
of Rs.5,889/-, 1/2 is deducted towards personal expenses of
the deceased. The learned Tribunal has applied the
multiplier of 8 whereas the appropriate multiplier according
to the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of
Sarla Verma Vs. Delhi Transport Corporation, 2009 (6)
Scale 129 is 11 considering the age of the mother to be 54
years. Applying the multiplier of 11, the loss of dependency
is computed to be Rs.4,95,000/- (Rs.7,500 x 1/2 x 12 x 11).
7. The learned Tribunal has not awarded any
compensation towards loss of estate. Rs.10,000/- is awarded
towards loss of estate. The appellants are entitled to total
compensation of Rs.5,45,000/- (Rs.4,95,000 + Rs.10,000/-
towards loss of estate + Rs.30,000/- towards loss of love and
affection + Rs.10,000/- towards funeral expenses).
8. The appeal is allowed and the award amount is
enhanced from Rs.2,52,040/- to Rs.5,45,000/- along with
interest @7.5% per annum from the date of filing of the
petition till realization.
9. The enhanced award amount along with interest be
deposited by respondent No.1 with UCO Bank, Delhi High
Court Branch A/c Saroj Lamba by means of a cheque through
Mr. M.M. Tandon, Member-Retail Team, UCO Bank Zonal,
Parliament Street, New Delhi (Mobile No. 09310356400)
within 30 days.
10. Upon the aforesaid amount being deposited, UCO Bank
is directed to release 50% of the same to appellants No.1
and 2 by transferring the same to their joint Saving Bank
Account.
11. The remaining 50% amount be kept in fixed deposit in
the joint names of appellants No.1 and 2 for a period of two
years with cumulative interest.
12. Copy of this order be given 'Dasti' to learned counsel
for the parties under the signature of Court Master.
J.R. MIDHA, J
DECEMBER 09, 2009 aj
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!