Citation : 2009 Latest Caselaw 3470 Del
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2009
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C.) No.10568/2009
% Date of Decision: 31.08.2009
Shri Sagar Mehra .... Petitioner
Through Mr.Raman Duggal, Advocate
Versus
Delhi Technological University .... Respondent
Through Ms.Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR
1. Whether reporters of Local papers may be YES
allowed to see the judgment?
2. To be referred to the reporter or not? NO
3. Whether the judgment should be reported in NO
the Digest?
ANIL KUMAR, J. (ORAL)
*
This is a petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India
seeking direction to the respondent to admit the petitioner to the course
of Master of Engineering (Structural Engineering) for the academic
session 2009-2010. The petitioner has also sought an inquiry into the
alleged malpractice in admission process.
Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the petitioner
has been granted admission in the course of Master of Engineering
(Structural Engineering) for academic session 2009-2010.
Consequently, the relief of the petitioner seeking admission to the
course of Master of Engineering (Structural Engineering) for academic
sessions 2009-2010 does not survive.
As far as the relief for holding an inquiry into the alleged
malpractice in the admission process, considering the pleas and
contentions raised by the parties, the case of alleged malpractice is not
made on the basis of the averments made by the petitioner. The relief
of inquiry into the alleged malpractice is, therefore, declined.
The writ petition is disposed of. Parties are left to bear their own
costs.
August 31, 2009 ANIL KUMAR, J. 'Dev'
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!