Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cit vs Vikas Leasing Ltd.
2003 Latest Caselaw 413 Del

Citation : 2003 Latest Caselaw 413 Del
Judgement Date : 10 April, 2003

Delhi High Court
Cit vs Vikas Leasing Ltd. on 10 April, 2003
Equivalent citations: 2003 131 TAXMAN 303 Delhi

ORDER

In this appeal under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the revenue seeks to challenge the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 30-7-2001 in ITA No. 6053 (Del) of 1995, pertaining to the assessment year 1992-93.

2. The only issue, which is sought to be raised by the revenue, is as to whether the commercial vehicles leased out by the assessed for running them on hire, would be entitled to higher rate of depreciation at 40 per cent or not.

2. The only issue, which is sought to be raised by the revenue, is as to whether the commercial vehicles leased out by the assessed for running them on hire, would be entitled to higher rate of depreciation at 40 per cent or not.

3. Insofar as this court is concerned, the issue raised is no more res integra. In CIT v. Bansal Credits Ltd. (2003) 259 ITR 69 (Del) this court has held that on a plain reading of section 32 of the Act and Entry III(2)(ii) in Appendix I to the Rules, it is clear that it is the user of the substantial asset which is relevant for determining the percentage of depreciation under the said section. If it is found that the leased out vehicle is used for running it on hire, depreciation at a higher rate is to be allowed.

3. Insofar as this court is concerned, the issue raised is no more res integra. In CIT v. Bansal Credits Ltd. (2003) 259 ITR 69 (Del) this court has held that on a plain reading of section 32 of the Act and Entry III(2)(ii) in Appendix I to the Rules, it is clear that it is the user of the substantial asset which is relevant for determining the percentage of depreciation under the said section. If it is found that the leased out vehicle is used for running it on hire, depreciation at a higher rate is to be allowed.

4. In view of the said decision, no question of law survives for our consideration.

4. In view of the said decision, no question of law survives for our consideration.

5. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed.

5. The appeal is accordingly, dismissed.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter