Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 1616 Del
Judgement Date : 5 October, 2001
ORDER
Heard.
2. Neither the assessing officer nor the Commissioner (Appeals) had recorded any finding as regards the unauthorised manner of utilisation of the funds realised. It has not been indicated as to how there was infraction of any statutory requirement. On the contrary, the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding that there was due compliance with the statutory requirements. In view of such findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, holding that the case of the assessed fell beyond the ken of section 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, no question of law, much less a substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. We find no merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.
2. Neither the assessing officer nor the Commissioner (Appeals) had recorded any finding as regards the unauthorised manner of utilisation of the funds realised. It has not been indicated as to how there was infraction of any statutory requirement. On the contrary, the Tribunal has recorded a clear finding that there was due compliance with the statutory requirements. In view of such findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, holding that the case of the assessed fell beyond the ken of section 13 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, no question of law, much less a substantial question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. We find no merit in this appeal, which is accordingly dismissed.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!