Saturday, 02, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cit vs Brig. Kapil Mohan
2001 Latest Caselaw 813 Del

Citation : 2001 Latest Caselaw 813 Del
Judgement Date : 31 May, 2001

Delhi High Court
Cit vs Brig. Kapil Mohan on 31 May, 2001
Equivalent citations: 2001 119 TAXMAN 226 Delhi

JUDGMENT

Heard the learned counsel for the revenue.

At the instance of the revenue following questions have been referred under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 I(hereinafter referred to as the Act) for opinion of this court :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the provisions of section 64(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 did not apply to the shares received by the assessed and thereby deleting the dividend income of Rs. 47,757 from his taxable income ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in holding that the trust settled for the benefit of the sole beneficiary, 1st son of Shri Rakesh Mohan who was unborn at the time of creation of the trust, is a valid trust."

2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1986-87.

2. The dispute relates to the assessment year 1986-87.

3. So far as the first issue is concerned, our judgment in CWT/CIT v. Lt. Col. Kapil Mohan (2001) 24 DTC 81 (Del-HC) : (2001) 251 ITR 386 (Del) will cover this case also. Directions given for rehearing by the Tribunal on the factual aspects shall also govern this question. So far as the second question is concerned, we had occasion to deal with the similar issue in CIT v. Brig. Kapil Mohan (2001) 252 ITR 830 (Del), which will govern this question also. The answer to the question would be in the affirmative, in favor of the assessed and against the revenue.

3. So far as the first issue is concerned, our judgment in CWT/CIT v. Lt. Col. Kapil Mohan (2001) 24 DTC 81 (Del-HC) : (2001) 251 ITR 386 (Del) will cover this case also. Directions given for rehearing by the Tribunal on the factual aspects shall also govern this question. So far as the second question is concerned, we had occasion to deal with the similar issue in CIT v. Brig. Kapil Mohan (2001) 252 ITR 830 (Del), which will govern this question also. The answer to the question would be in the affirmative, in favor of the assessed and against the revenue.

4. Reference is disposed of accordingly.

4. Reference is disposed of accordingly.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter