Thursday, 23, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Cit vs Mrs. Indira K.P. Singh
2000 Latest Caselaw 502 Del

Citation : 2000 Latest Caselaw 502 Del
Judgement Date : 24 May, 2000

Delhi High Court
Cit vs Mrs. Indira K.P. Singh on 24 May, 2000
Equivalent citations: 2001 118 TAXMAN 53 Delhi
Author: A Pasayat

JUDGMENT

Arijit Pasayat, C.J.

At the instance of revenue a reference has been made under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). The Tribunal, Delhi Bench 'D', has referred the following questions for opinion of this court :

"1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that section 52(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, was not applicable to the facts of the case of the present assessee in computing the capital gains from the sale of shares ?

2. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the sum of Rs. 19,982 was not taxable as the business income of the assessee from dealings in land ?

3. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the sum of Rs. 19,982 was not chargeable to tax even as capital gains ?"

So far as the first question is concerned, in view of the positive finding of fact that the assessee did not receive any amount in excess of the amount indicated in the sale deeds, decision of the Apex Court in K.P. Varghese v. ITO (1981) 131 ITR 597 (SC) will be applicable. The answer, therefore, has to be in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

So far as the question No. 2 is concerned, an identical issue came up for consideration before this court in the case of CIT v. Raghuvendra Singh (IT Case No. 198 of 1982). The decision of the Tribunal holding that the amount in question was taxable as capital gains was upheld and department's special leave petition was also dismissed by order dated 11-12-1989. Following the ratio of the said case, we hold that the Tribunal was right in its view. The question is, accordingly, answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue.

As regards question No. 3, in view of the Explanation to section 2(1A) inserted by the Finance Act, 1989 with retrospective effect from 1-4-1970, the question has to be answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.

The reference is, accordingly, disposed of.

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter