Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 960 Chatt
Judgement Date : 24 March, 2026
1
Digitally
signed by
ABHIGYA
2026:CGHC:13991
ABHIGYA SAXENA
SAXENA Date:
2026.03.25
16:46:31
+0530
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MAC No. 1596 of 2019
1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through Branch
Manager, Avenue Hotel, Jagdalpur, District Bastar
Chhattisgarh.(Insurer Of Offending Bus Bearing Registration No.
C.G. 17 F 0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s)
versus
1 - Sakru Ram Thakur S/o Sonaram Thakur, Aged About 40
Years R/o Anjar, Lohandiguda, District Bastar Chhattisgarh.,
District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
2 - Sudar Kashyap S/o Samaru Kashyap R/o Village Anjar
Kosapara, Police Station Mardum, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (
Driver Of Offiending Bus Bearing Registration No. C. G. (Driver
Of Offending Bus Bearing Reigistration No. C.G., 17- F- 0314),
District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
3 - Satyendra Singh Kushwah S/o Narsingh Kushwah Kushwah
Travels Shanti Nagar, Ward No. 26, Jagdalpur, District Bastar
Chhattisgarh., District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Avenue Hotel, Jagdalpur, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh................(Insurer Of Offending Bus Bearing
Registration No. C.G.-17-F-0314)................(Non-Applicant No.3), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s) Versus 1 - Diwakar Thakur S/o Jaindhar Thakur Aged About 35 Years R/o Kotiyaguda, Pujaripara, Lohandiguda, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh.............(Claimant), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
2 - Sudar Kashyap S/o Somaru Kashyap Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Anjar Kosapara, Police Station Mardum, District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh...............(Driver Of Offending Bus Bearing Registration No. C.G.-17-F-0314)................(Non-Applicant No.1), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
3 - Satyendra Singh Kushwah S/o Narsingh Kushwah Kushwah Travels, Shanti Nagar Ward No. 26, Jagdalpur District- Bastar, Chhattisgarh...............(Owner Of Offending Bus Bearing Registration No. C.G.-17-F-0314)................(Non-Applicant No.2), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Avenue Hotel, Jagdalpur, District Bastar Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Offending Bus Bearing Registrations No. C.G.-17-F- 0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s) Versus 1 - Chameli Thakur W/o - Sukman Thakur Aged About 45 Years R/o - Schoolpara, Chhindgaon, Kumhli, Lohandiguda, District Baster Chhattisgarh (Claimant), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
2 - Sundar Kashyap S/o - Somaru Kashyap Aged About 35 Years R/o - Village Anjar Kosapara, Police Station Mardum, District Baster Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Offending Bus Bearing Registrations No. C.G.-17-F-0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
3 - Satyendra Singh Kushwah S/o - Narsingh Kushwah, Kushwah Travels, Shanti Nagar Ward No. 26, Jagdalpur District Baster Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Offending Bus Bearing Registration No. C.G.-17-F-0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s)
1 - The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Through Branch Manager, Avenue Hotel, Jagdalpur, District Baster Chhattisgarh (Insurer Of Offending Bus Bearing Registrations On C.G.-17-F- 0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Appellant(s) Versus 1 - Parwati Thakur W/o - Diwakar Thakur Aged About 30 Years R/o - Kotiyaguda, Pujaripara Lohandigud, District Baster Chhattisgarh, District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
2 - Sundar Kashyap S/o - Somaru Kashyap Aged About 35 Years R/o - Village Anjar Kosapara, Police Station Mardum, District Baster Chhattisgarh (Driver Of Offending Bus Bearing Registrations On C.G.-17-F-0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
3 - Satyendra Singh Kushwah S/o - Narsingh Kushwah, Kushwah Travels, Shanti Nagar Ward No.26, Jagdalpur District
Bastar Chhattisgarh (Owner Of Offending Bus Bearing Registration No. C.G.-17-F-0314), District : Bastar(Jagdalpur), Chhattisgarh
--- Respondent(s) For Appellant/Insurance : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate Company Mr. Praveen Kumar Dhurandhar, For Driver & Owner :
Advocate
SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 24.03.2026
1. Heard On. I.A. No.01 - applications for condonation of
delay in filing the appeals being MAC No.1595/2019, MAC
No.1598/2019 & MAC No.1599/2019.
2. Upon due consideration and for the reasons assigned in
the applications, the same are allowed.
3. Delay in filing these appeals are hereby condoned.
4. Since common question of facts is involved in these
appeals, therefore, they have been clubbed together, heard
together and are being decided by this common order.
5. The facts of the case, in brief, are that on 6 th of February,
2017, Smt. Chameli Thakur, Sakru Ram Thakur, Smt.
Parvati Thakur, and Diwakar Thakur departed from village
Usribeda in a bus bearing registration No. CG 17 F 0314
to attend a wedding procession. During the return journey,
near Turgura Lohra Para, the said bus, being driven by
Respondent No. 2 in a rash and negligent manner,
overturned, resulting in the claimants sustaining grievous
injuries. In particular, one of the claimants, namely, Sakru
Ram Thakur suffered severe injuries on his left arm and
shoulder, leading to permanent disability. Respondent No.
3 is the registered owner of the offending vehicle, while the
Appellant is the insurer of the said vehicle.
6. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the driver
of the offending vehicle did not possess the requisite
endorsement on his driving licence to operate a public
service vehicle (PSVBUS) at the time of accident, which
occurred on 06.02.2017. It is further contended that the
endorsement authorizing the driver to operate a transport
vehicle was renewed on 13.04.2017 and was valid up to
12.04.2020 as per the testimony of Pratap Singh Rajput
(PW-01), Assitant Grade III from the RTO Office,
Jagdalpur, District Bastar, Chhattisgarh.
7. Per contra, learned counsel appearing for the owner and
the driver submits that Exhibit D-3 clearly shows that the
requisite endorsement for operating a PSVBUS had already
been issued on 10.02.2016 and remained valid for
transport purpose upto 12.04.2020. It is further submitted
that the Insurance Company has failed to disprove the
authenticity and validity of the said endorsement.
Accordingly, it is submitted that the liability to pay
compensation has rightly been fastened upon the
Insurance Company.
8. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties
and have carefully considered the submissions advanced
on behalf of both the parties.
9. Admittedly, the offending vehicle was a Public Service
Vehicle (PSV), for which an endorsement of PSVBUS was
required on the driving licence of the driver. According to
the witness examined on behalf of the Insurance
Company, namely Pratap Singh Rajput, the requisite
endorsement was valid up to 12.09.2019 and was
thereafter renewed on 13.04.2017, with validity up to
12.04.2020. It is the contention of the Insurance Company
that on the date of the accident the driver did not possess
the requisite endorsement. However, Exhibit D-03 clearly
establishes that the driver of the offending vehicle
possessed a valid endorsement to drive a PSVBUS for the
period from 10.02.2016 to 12.04.2020, authorizing him to
operate a Public Service Vehicle. The said document has
been duly proved by the owner of the vehicle i.e.
respondent No.3, namely, Satyendra Singh Kushwaha.
Furthermore, no cross-examination has been made by the
Insurance Company to discredit the said document, nor
has it been suggested that the driving licence was renewed
subsequent to the date of the accident.
10. In view of the above, Exhibit D-3 clearly indicates that
the driver of the offending vehicle was holding a valid and
effective driving licence, with the requisite endorsement of
PSVBUS, on the date of the accident. Accordingly, the
finding recorded by the learned Claims Tribunal that the
driver possessed a valid driving licence to operate a Public
Service Vehicle is a correct finding of fact and warrants no
interference of this Court, therefore, I do not find any merit
in the present appeals and they are accordingly,
dismissed. No cost(s).
s
Sd/- Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Saxena
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!