Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akash Khare vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 704 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 704 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 5, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Akash Khare vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 18 March, 2026

                                                           1




                                                                           2026:CGHC:12962
                                                                                          NAFR

                                 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                               MCRC No. 2527 of 2026
                    Akash Khare S/o Late Satyaprakash Khare Aged About 44 Years R/o- Village
                    Rajendra Nagar Colony, Police Station- Gandhinagar, Tehsil- Ambikapur,
                    District- Surguja (C.G.)
                                                                                       ... Applicant
                                                        versus
                    State Of Chhattisgarh Through Officer In Charge, Surajpur Police Station,
                    District Surajpur, C.G.
                                                                                 ... Non-Applicant
                    For Applicant              : Mr. Anurag Singh, Advocate.
                    For Non-Applicant/State    : Dr. Saurabh Pande, Deputy Advocate General.

       Digitally
       signed by
       PREETI                         Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
PREETI KUMARI
KUMARI Date:
       2026.03.19
       10:48:44
       +0530
                                                   Order on Board

                    18.03.2026

                    1.

The applicant has preferred this First Bail Application under Section 483

of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail,

as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 12/2026 registered

at Police Station - Surajpur, District - Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code.

2. The case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, the accused/applicant

cheated the complainant of Rs.13,35,027 on the pretext of securing a job

for the complainant's son in SECL. The accused in his memorandum

statement admitted that he purchased a plot in the name of his wife using

the money obtained from the complainant. Thereafter, during course of

investigation, present applicant has been arrested.

3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is

innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to a

financial dispute between the parties relating to land transactions, and

that the complaint has been filed with an ulterior motive. It is further

submitted that there is a delay of about three years in lodging the FIR,

inasmuch as the alleged offence is stated to have taken place in the year

2023, whereas the FIR has been registered in the year 2026. Learned

counsel submits that the allegations arise out of financial dealings and

profit-sharing in land transactions, which clearly indicate that the dispute

is civil in nature, and that the present criminal proceedings have been

initiated only to give a criminal colour to a civil dispute. It is also submitted

that the applicant has no prior criminal antecedents. It is further submitted

that the charge-sheet has already been filed and the applicant has been

in judicial custody since 09.01.2026. Considering that the conclusion of

the trial is likely to take considerable time, a prayer has been made for

grant of bail to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, the learned State counsel opposed the bail application

and submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed in the present case.

He further submits that from the perusal of the case diary, it is also

revealed that the accused Akash Khare is alleged to have fraudulently

obtained Rs.13,35,027 from the complainant Hemant Rajwade on the

pretext of securing a job in S.E.C.L. for his son, Ankur Rajwade. Hence,

he is not entitled for grant of bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

documents available on record.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,

nature and gravity of allegation levelled against the applicant and the fact

that there is a delay of about three years in lodging the FIR, inasmuch as

the alleged offence is stated to have taken place in the year 2023,

whereas the FIR has been registered in the year 2026, further the

applicant has no previous criminal antecedent, the charge-sheet has

been filed and he is in jail since 09.01.2026 and conclusion of the trial is

likely to take some time, this Court is of the view that the applicant is

entitled to be released on bail in this case.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant -

Akash Khare, involved in Crime No. 12/2026 registered at Police Station

- Surajpur Police Station, District - Surajpur (C.G.) for the offence

punishable under Section 420 of Indian Penal Code, be released on bail

on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the

satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect

that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates

fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in

court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open

for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and

pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial

court on each date fixed, either personally or through his

counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause,

the trial court may proceed against him under Section

269 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail

during trial and in order to secure his presence,

proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS. is issued and

the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date

fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall

initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law,

under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person,

before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of

the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of

statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion

of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or

without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial

court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and

proceed against him in accordance with law.

8. However, it will be open for the prosecuting agency to initiate prosecution

against the complainant of the present case also who claims to have been

cheated by the applicant herein as the conduct of the complainant

amounts to giving bribe for obtaining employment through illegal mode.

9. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court

concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith.

Sd/--

(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice

Preeti

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter