Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

M/S Radhaswami Plastic Industries vs Employees State Insurance Corporation
2026 Latest Caselaw 691 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 691 Chatt
Judgement Date : 18 March, 2026

[Cites 7, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

M/S Radhaswami Plastic Industries vs Employees State Insurance Corporation on 18 March, 2026

                                                            1




                                                                                2026:CGHC:12907
                                                                                           NAFR
SOURABH
BHILWAR
Digitally signed by
                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
SOURABH
BHILWAR
Date: 2026.03.18
18:07:51 +0530

                                                  MA No. 81 of 2022


                      M/s Radhaswami Plastic Industries Through Director, Chandprakash
                      Bajaj S/o Late Shri H.R. Bajaj, Aged About 53 Years, R/o 43-A/1,
                      Industrial Area, Tifra, Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
                                                                                   ... Appellant(s)


                                                         versus


                      1 - Employees State Insurance Corporation Through Regional Director,
                      107, Jagnnath Chowk, Ramnagar Road, Kota, Raipur, Chhattisgarh


                      2 - Recovery Officer Employees State Insurance Corporation, Raipur,
                      Chhattisgarh


                      3 - Branch Manager, I.C.I.C.I. Bank Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh


                      4 - Branch Manager, Axis Bank Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh


                      5   -   Branch   Manager,     Oriental    Bank   Of   Commerce       Bilaspur,
                      Chhattisgarh
                                                                                    ... Respondent

(Cause title is taken from Case Information System) For Appellant : Mr. S.P. Kale, Advocate For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Pranav Saxena, Advocate For Respondent No.3 : None, despite service of notice For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Prashant Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Akhilesh Mishra, Advocate

(HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board

18/03/2026

1. The present appeal has been filed by the appellant under Section

82 of the Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short, 'the

ESI Act, 1948'), challenging the impugned order dated 29/06/2022

passed by the Court of Employees' Insurance, ESIC, Labour

Court, Bilaspur (C.G.).

2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that during pendency of

the present appeal, the respondent-ESIC, on 24/07/2025, has

introduced a scheme, namely, the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025,

for withdrawal of criminal cases filed against insured persons and

employers, as well as for settlement of cases filed by employers

under Sections 75 and 82 of the ESI Act, 1948. It is further

submitted that an application has been filed along with a copy of

the said scheme seeking permission to avail the benefit of the

aforesaid scheme.

3. Learned counsel for the respondents have no objection to the

above prayer made by the counsel for the appellant.

4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties, perused the record

and the provisions of the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025.

5. For the sake of convenience, the relevant terms and conditions of

the New Amnesty Scheme, 2025 are quoted below :-

"(ii) DISPUTE OF CONTRIBUTION:

This Scheme shall also include cases in which

the employer has disputed the determination of

contribution under section 45A or under section 45AA or

recovery of contribution, in the Employees State

Insurance Court, u/s 75 of the ESI Act, made the appeal

u/s 82 of the Act or under article 226 of Constitution of

India (where substantial question of law is not involved),

up to 31.03.2025 subject to the fulfilment of the

following conditions:

i. The employer shall file a petition before the

Hon'ble Court where he has raised the dispute and

seek permission of Hon'ble Court for out of Court

settlement of matter under litigation. If the Court

allows, then the matter shall be settled as per the

scheme. The employer shall apply for the Amnesty

scheme in the proforma prescribed by the

corporation

ii. The employer shall pay both the Employees' and

Employers' share of contribution and interest on the

revised amount of as per their records, which he

shall produce before the assessing officers, if the

contribution has been assessed on assumed

wages and he shall comply with other provisions of

the Act.

iii. In case all the records required for assessment

of contribution are not available with the employer,

they shall produce alternative records such as

EPFO and Income Tax Record etc. and shall pay

the contribution accordingly as per these records.

iv. However, if the employer is not able to produce

any of the records and the assessment has been

made in respect of wages other than the wages

shown in Regulation 32 Register, he shall pay the

contribution which shall be not less than 30% of the

assessed amount of contribution. The cases where

assessment has already been made as per Hors

instruction No. P-11/13/97-Ins-IV dated 26.05.2003

or where the contribution has been assessed on

actual basis will not fall under the purview of the

scheme.

v. The employer shall pay Interest as per the

revised contribution.

vi. No damages shall be levied.

vii. The employer shall also furnish an undertaking

to the Corporation to the effect that he/she shall be

regular in compliance in the provisions of ESI Act in

future or else he/she shall forfeit the right to avail of

such amnesty scheme."

6. In view of the aforesaid benevolent scheme introduced by the

ESIC for settlement of disputes, the appellant is permitted to

move an appropriate application before the competent authority

under the said scheme.

7. Accordingly, the present appeal stands disposed of with the

aforesaid permission.

8. The appellant would be at liberty to approach this Court for

restoration of the present appeal, if the ESIC does not proceed

under the said scheme.

Sd/-

(BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE

$. Bhilwar

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter