Friday, 10, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohd. Rizil N T vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 147 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 147 Chatt
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2026

[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Mohd. Rizil N T vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 February, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                          1




GOURI
MUDALIAR
Digitally signed by
GOURI MUDALIAR                                                          2026:CGHC:10301
Date: 2026.02.28
14:48:49 +0530


                                                                                        NAFR

                                   HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR


                                             MCRCA No. 262 of 2026

                      Mohd. Rizil N T S/o Aliyammu Aged About 28 Years R/o Nammbiarthodi
                      House, Vellayur Post Vellayur, District Malappuram, State Kerla
                                                                                 ... Applicant


                                                      versus


                      State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station -
                      Basantpur, District - Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh
                                                                              ... Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Anurag Verma, Advocate.

                      For                 : Shri Soumya Rai, Dy.G.A.
                      Respondent/State


                                               Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
                                                 Order On Board
                      27/02/2026

1. The applicant has preferred this second application under Section

482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short

'BNSS'), for grant of anticipatory bail, apprehending his arrest in

connection with Crime No. 365/2024, registered at Police Station

Basantpur, District Rajnandgaon (C.G) for alleged commission of

offence punishable under Sections 318(4),338,336(3),340(2) R/w

3(5) of the B.N.S 2023 & Section 66(d) of the I.T Act.

2. According to the prosecution's story, the complainant Rahul Jain

lodged a complaint on 17/08/2024 against the unknown person

that he joined a Whatsapp group named Friends of Wealth 81

through his Whatsapp No. 79996-xxxxx via website link, which

was regarding providing high profits in stock market through

trading and IPO investments. The said Whatsapp group was

made on 07/02/2020 and was having many admins one of them

was named Lalita. That the group admins used to share the stock

analysis of particular stock for seeking investments from group

members and other admins used to support the analysis. On

26/07/2024, a personal message was sent to complainant from

group admin named Lalita to seek some investment/trading

amount from him and complainant's account was created.

Complainant in order to invest and trade amount to gain profit sent

the investment amount of Rs 3,40,95,000/- in different bank

accounts as asked by the group admin Lalita. In the same

sequence, information was taken from Bandhan Bank branch

Rajnandgaon regarding the primary bank account number

2010002826703 of Bandhan Bank used by the accused, the

account number 20100028xxxxx was found to be in the name of

SKY Tour and Travels Lucknow (Uttar Pradesh). A total of Rs

1,46,30,000/- was deposited in the said bank account by the

applicant Rahul Jain from his sister Prachi Jain's Bank of Baroda

account number 262001000xxxxx and HDFC bank account

number 502000766xxxxx through RTGS/NEFT from 08.08.2024

to 09.08.2024. Did Had gone. During investigation, on the basis of

the account statement of the said bank and acknowledgment

number 33308240015046 of the National Cyber Portal,

information was received that out of the amount deposited by the

applicant Rahul Jain in the account number 20100028xxxxx used

by the accused, Rs 7,30,000/- was deposited through RTGS, Axis

Bank Account Number Deposit has been made in

9240100155xxxxx. Thereafter, information was taken through

Cyber Cell Rajnandgaon regarding the account number

9240100155xxxxxx of Axis Bank, which is the account number of

Axis Bank. The account holder of serial number 9240100155xxxxx

was found to be MOHAMMED RIZIL NT and registered mobile

number was 9715224xxxxx. On the basis of the account

statement of the said account number 9240100155xxxxx and

National Cyber Portal, information was received that the amount

of Rs 7,30,000/- defrauded. from the applicant was transferred

from different bank accounts to accounts in many parts and

withdrawal of cash was done from ATM. The applicant has filed

bail application No. 7970/2024 before Hon'ble Kerala High Court

seeking transit bail till approaching this jurisdictional Court with

regards to crime No 365/2024 registered in polices station

Basantpur, Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh. The Hon'ble Court vide

order dated 23/09/2024 granted transit bail and the bail

application No. Β.Α 7970/2024 was disposed.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this is the second

anticipatory bail application of the applicant and the first

anticipatory bail application of the applicant was rejected by this

Court on merits vide order dated 19/12/2024 in MCRCA

No.1402/2024. He would submit that the applicant is innocent and

has been falsely implicated solely on the basis of the

memorandum statement of co-accused Shahal Sa, who has

already been acquitted by the Trial Court. The complainant has

neither named the applicant in the FIR nor alleged any direct

transaction or contact with him. The applicant's role was limited to

sale of USDT cryptocurrency, and the amount received in his bank

account was sale consideration transferred by Meera Suresh from

the account of M/s Sky Tours & Travels. There is no material to

show that the amount was illegal or linked to the complainant. It is

submitted that the charge-sheet has been filed, the case is based

on documentary evidence already in possession of the

prosecution, and custodial interrogation is not required, therefore

he prays to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail.

4. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for

grant of anticipatory bail.

5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

materials available on record.

6. From perusal of the records, it transpires that this is the second

anticipatory bail application of the applicant and the first

anticipatory bail application of the applicant was rejected by this

Court on merits vide order dated 19/12/2024 in MCRCA

No.1402/2024. There appears to be no new ground raised in this

second anticipatory bail application to entertain the same.

7. Accordingly, the second anticipatory bail application of the

applicant - Mohd. Rizil N T, involved in Crime No. 365/2024,

registered at Police Station Basantpur, District Rajnandgaon (C.G)

for alleged commission of offence punishable under Sections

318(4),338,336(3),340(2) R/w 3(5) of the B.N.S 2023 & Section

66(d) of the I.T Act is rejected. Sd/-Sd

S S Sd/-

(Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice

gouri

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter