Sunday, 12, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mohammad Juned Chauhan vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2026 Latest Caselaw 139 Chatt

Citation : 2026 Latest Caselaw 139 Chatt
Judgement Date : 27 February, 2026

[Cites 2, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Mohammad Juned Chauhan vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 27 February, 2026

Author: Ramesh Sinha
Bench: Ramesh Sinha
                                                             1




GOURI
MUDALIAR
Digitally signed by
GOURI MUDALIAR                                                               2026:CGHC:10304
Date: 2026.02.28
14:48:50 +0530                                                                               NAFR

                                HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                                  MCRC No. 2048 of 2026

                       Mohammad Juned Chauhan S/o Mohammad Sharif Chauhan Aged About 25
                      Years R/o Idgah Bhata Behind Muslim Hall, P.S. Azad Chowk District- Raipur
                      (C.G.) (As Per Challan)                                          ... Applicant
                                                          versus
                      State Of Chhattisgarh Through- PS Azad Chowk District- Raipur Chhattisgarh
                                                                                    ... Respondent

For Applicant : Shri Ashish Gangwani, Advocate.

                      For                  :     Shri Soumya Rai, Dy.G.A.
                      Respondent/State


                                                Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice
                                                     Order on Board
                      27/02/2026

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya

Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short 'BNSS') for grant of regular

bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime

No.307/2025 registered at Police Station PS Azad Chowk, District

Raipur (C.G) for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 296,

351(2), 115(2), 118(1), 191(3) of B.N.S. and Section 25, 27 of Arms Act

(as per challan).

2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that complainant Mohammad Altaf

has lodged a report to this effect in Police Station Azad Chowk, District

Raipur that on 18.10.2025, during the procession of Sandal Chadar,

there was an argument with the boys of Idgah Bhata in Baijnath Para,

in connection with which he had gone to Idgah Bhata along with Syed

Sohaib Ali, Mohammad Altaf, Mohammad Zakir, Abdul Aziz,

Mohammad Aman, Mohammad Amin to talk to the boys of the locality

at around 10.30 pm on 19.10.2025 Where he met Sameer, Aavesh,

Saif, Sarfaroz, Moin, Sahil Bagga, Junaid and other people and was

talking to them, then Saif and Sarfaroz started abusing him with filthy

language and asked why he had come there. When he stopped them

from abusing, they all unanimously started beating him with fists and

knives, bats and rods in their hands with the intention of killing him.

Due to the beating, Mohammad Zakir got injured on his back, Syed

Sohaib Ali on his head, stomach, Abdul Azim on his head, left hand,

thigh, Mohammad Aman on his head, back of the neck and his left

hand shoulder and finger. On the above report of the complainant,

Azad Chowk police station, Raipur district registered crime number

307/2025 against the accused.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant was armed

with an wooden bat whereas the co-accused was also armed with

knife. It is argued that there were four injured persons who have

suffered injuries of blunt object as well as sharp edge weapon but the

injuries though was stated to be grievous in nature but there is no X ray

report to show that any internal damage was caused. He would submit

that the charge sheet has been filed in this case, the applicant is in jail

since 20/10/2025 and conclusion of trial will take some time, therefore,

he prays for grant of bail to the applicant.

4. On the other hand, learned State Counsel opposes the bail application

and he would submit that charge sheet has been filed in this case

before the competent court and the applicant has no criminal

antecedents.

5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the

case diary.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case,

submission of learned counsel for the parties, further the fact that the

applicant was armed with an wooden bat whereas the co-accused was

also armed with knife and four injured persons have suffered injuries of

blunt object as well as sharp edge weapon but the injuries though was

stated to be grievous in nature but there is no X ray report to show that

any internal damage was caused, period of detention of the applicant

since 20/10/2025, charge sheet has been filed, applicant has no

criminal antecedents and also considering the fact that trial is likely to

take some time for its conclusion, therefore this Court is of the view

that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the

Applicant-Mohammad Juned Chauhan, involved in Crime

No.307/2025 registered at Police Station PS Azad Chowk, District

Raipur (C.G) for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 296,

351(2), 115(2), 118(1), 191(3) of B.N.S. and Section 25, 27 of Arms

Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two

sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with

the following conditions:-

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he

shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence

when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this

condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of

liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on

each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case

of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may

proceed against him under Section 269 of Bharatiya Nyaya

Sanhita.

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial

and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section

84 of BNSS. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the

court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court

shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law,

under Section 209 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial

court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of

charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of

BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant

is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for

the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and

proceed against him in accordance with law.

8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court

for necessary information and compliance.

Sd/-

                                                           (Ramesh Sinha)
gouri                                                     CHIEF JUSTICE
 

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Media

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter