Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 1834 Chatt
Judgement Date : 7 February, 2025
Digitally
signed by
ASHISH
1/2
ASHISH TIWARI
TIWARI Date:
2025.02.10
16:51:19
+0530
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 723 of 2004
SANTOSH KUMAR Versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH
CRA/969/2004
07/02/2025 Shri Anurag khatri, Advocate for the appellant in
Cr.A.No.969/2004.
Ms. M. Asha and Ms. Anuradha Jain, Panel Lawyer for the
respondent/State.
By the impugned judgment dated 06/08/20-04 passed by
II Additional Session Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions trial No.
75/2004, accused - Riddhigiri, Tukaram and Bharat Yadav were
convicted under Sections 395 of IPC whereas Santosh Kumar
was convicted under section 414 of IPC.
Appeal preferred by accused - Riddhigiri stood abated
vide order dated 20/08/2024 passed in Cr.A. 942/2004, as he
died on 23/12/2023.
Registry to verify as to whether any appeal has been filed
by accused -Tukaram, S/o. Bhairam, R/o. Village - Gorakhpur,
Police Station - Laalpur, District - Bilaspur (C.G.) against the
impugned judgment dated 06/08/20-04 passed by II Additional
Session Judge, Bilaspur in Sessions trial No. 75/2004.
List the case week after next.
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Ashish
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!