Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Keshav Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh
2025 Latest Caselaw 3668 Chatt

Citation : 2025 Latest Caselaw 3668 Chatt
Judgement Date : 16 April, 2025

Chattisgarh High Court

Keshav Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 16 April, 2025

                                              1
SMT
NIRMALA
RAO




                                                           2025:CGHC:17430

                                                                        NAFR

                  HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

                                   WPC No. 332 of 2019

          1 - Anil Sahu S/o Shri Amar Singh Sahu Aged About 45 Years R/o Village
          Dongargarh Tehsil Nagari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District :
          Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                                  ... Petitioner

                                           versus

          1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary ,department Of
          Panchayat And Disaster Management Mahanadi, Bhawan Atal Nagar
          District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

          2 - Commissioner Raipur Division District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District :
          Raipur,                                                    Chhattisgarh

          3 - Collector Dhamatari District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,
          Chhattisgarh

          4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue ) Nagari ,tehsil Nagari, District
          Dhamtari   Chhattisgarh.,   District  :   Dhamtari,    Chhattisgarh

          5 - Naib Tehsildar Nagari District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District :
          Dhamtari,                                               Chhattisgarh

          6 - Aswan Kumar S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongargarh District
          Dhamtari   Chhattisgarh., District  :   Dhamtari,    Chhattisgarh

          7 - Nandkumar S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongardula ,district
          Dhamtari  Chhattisgarh.,  District :   Dhamtari,   Chhattisgarh
                                    -2-




8 - Birajhuram S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongardula ,district
Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                       ---- Respondents

                                  AND

                         WPC No. 336 of 2019

1 - Keshav Sahu S/o Shri Nakul Ram Sahu Aged About 42 Years R/o
   Village Dongardula, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh.,
   District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                         ... Petitioner

                                 versus

1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of
   Panchayat And Disaster Management Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar,
   District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2 - Commissioner Raipur Division District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.,
  District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3 - Collector Dhamtari, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur,
    Chhattisgarh

4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Nagri, Tehsil Nagri District
   Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

5   - Naib Tehsildar Nagri, District           Dhamtari,    Chhattisgarh.,
    District :Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

6 - Aswan Kumar S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongardula, District
    Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

7 - Nandkumar S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongardula, District
   Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

8 - Birajhuram S/o Bishabhar Gond R/o Village Dongardula, District
   Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                        ---- Respondents
                                             3




                                          AND

                               WPC No. 379 of 2019

 1 - Narayan Singh Sahu S/o Shri Domar Singh Sahu Aged About 47
    Years R/o Village Dongardula, Tehsil Nagri, District Dhamtari
    Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                      ... Petitioner

                                         versus

 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Government Of
   Chhattisgarh, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management,
   Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, District Raipur
   Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

 2 - Commissioner Raipur, Division, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District
     : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

 3 - Collector Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District :
    Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

 4 - Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Nagri, Tehsil Nagri, District
    Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

 5 - Naib Tehsildar Tehsil - Nagri, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District
     : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

 6 - Aswan Kumar S/o Bishabhar Gond Village - Dongardula, District
    Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

 7 - Nandkumar S/o Bishabhar Gond Village - Dongardula, District
    Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

 8 - Birajhuram S/o Bishabhar Gond Village Dongardula, District
    Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh
                                                     ---- Respondents
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Petitioners : Ms. Natasha Khan, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Yashwant Thakur, Advocate.

For Respondents No.1 to 5/ State: Shri R.S. Marhas, Addl. A.G.

For Respondents No.6 & 7 : Shri Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16.04.2025

1. The petitioners have challenged the show-cause notice issued by the

Naib Tehsildar, Nagri dated 23.1.2019, whereby the petitioners have

been directed to hand over the possession of the subject property.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would argue that the petitioners

raised the construction of houses and shops over the subject

property and the Naib Tehsildar, Nagri issued the eviction notice

without conducting any inquiry and without affording any

opportunity of hearing. She would further submit that the revenue

documents would show that the petitioners are owners of the

property. She would contend that the notice issued by the

respondent/Naib Tehsildar, Nagri may be quashed.

3. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would submit that

the application under Section 170B of the Chhattisgarh Land

Revenue Code was moved by respondents No.1 to 5 before the Sub-

Divisional Officer (Revenue), which was allowed vide order dated

27.5.2015. He would further submit that the petitioners had filed a

civil suit before the Competent Civil Court, which was dismissed

vide judgment and decree dated 31.1.2019. He would also submit

that the eviction notice was issued by the Naib Tehsildar, Nagri

pursuant to the order passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer

(Revenue) dated 27.5.2015. He would also submit that these

petitions deserve to be dismissed.

4. Learned counsel for respondents No.6 & 7 would support the

contention made by counsel for the State/respondents No.1 to 5.

5. Heard counsel appearing for the parties and perused the documents

present on the record.

6. A perusal of the documents would show that respondents No.1 to 5

belong to the aboriginal tribe and they had moved an application

under Section 170B of the CGLRC before the Competent Authority,

which was allowed vide order dated 27.5.2015. The petitioners

challenged the proceedings and the order dated 27.5.2015 by filing

a civil suit before the Additional District Judge, Dhamtari in Civil

Suit No.10-A of 2015. The civil suit was dismissed vide judgment

and decree dated 31.1.2019.

7. Pursuant to the order passed in the proceedings under Section 170B

of the CGLRC, Naib Tehsildar, Nagri issued an eviction notice to

the petitioners on 23.1.2019. The petitioners have challenged the

said notice by filing these petitions.

8. Taking into consideration the fact that the order passed by the Sub-

Divisional Officer (Revenue) dated 27.5.2015 has attained finality

and further, the civil suit filed by the petitioners was dismissed vide

judgment and decree dated 31.1.2019, no case is made out for

interference by this Court.

9. Consequently, these petitions fail and are hereby dismissed. No

cost(s).

Sd/-

(Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter