Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 554 Chatt
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2023
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 1171 of 2022
1. Xxx Nill
2. Yyy Nill
3. Zzz Nill
---- Applicants
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station- Pathalgaon,
District- Jashpur Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Applicants : Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sushil Sahu, P.L.
Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey Order on Board
27/01/2023
1. This criminal revision under Section 102 of the Juvenile Justice
(Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred
as "Act" of 2015) is directed against the judgment dated
31.10.2022 passed by the learned First Upper Sessions Judge,
Kunkuri to the link Court, Patthalgaon, District- Jashpur (C.G.) in
Criminal Appeal No. 05/2022, upholding the order dated
14.09.2022 of the Juvenile Justice Board, Jashpur (C.G.)
rejecting the bail application of the applicants in connection with
Crime No. 225/2022 registered at Police Station- Patthalgaon,
District- Jashpur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under
Sections 302, 201, 120(B), 379 & 414 of IPC.
2. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that in the midnight of
09.07.2022, applicants along with other co-accused persons
hatched a conspiracy to steal the motorcycle of the deceased
Iqbal Yadav and in furtherance of the conspiracy, applicants
strangulated the deceased with an intention to kill him and
thereafter, they stole the said motorcycle. It is further alleged that
the applicants took the dead body of the deceased on
motorcycle to Mainpart Hills near Kundi Jharia Nala and threw
away the body in order to hide the evidence and after 3 days of
the incident, applicants went back to the hiding spot and burnt
the dead body by pouring petrol. During investigation, on the
basis of memorandum statements of the applicants, burnt body
of the deceased along with other articles was found at Mainpart
Kumarta Hills near Kundi Jharia Nala.
3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are
innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He
further submits that the learned Court below has passed the
order against the principles of juvenile justice as the applicants
have no criminal background and the applicants are in custody
since 24.07.2022, the trial is likely to take some time and
keeping the applicants in custody it would affect their mental and
physical condition, therefore, the applicants may be released on
bail.
4. On the other hand learned State counsel supports the impugned
judgment.
5. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length and perused the
material available on record.
6. Having considered the submissions and particularly the facts and
circumstances of the case, considering the social investigation
report and also considering the principles and objectives of the
Juvenile Justice Act, this Court is of the considered opinion that it
is a fit case to release the applicants on bail.
7. In view of above consideration, the impugned order dated
31.10.2022 could not be sustained and is therefore, set aside.
The application under Section 12 of the Act is allowed. The
applicants shall be released on bail forthwith on furnishing a
personal bond in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each, by the parents or
guardians of the applicants, as the case may be, to the
satisfaction of the Juvenile Justice Board for their appearance
before the Board, as and when directed.
8. The revision is accordingly allowed.
Sd/-
(Rajani Dubey) Judge
Ruchi
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!