Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 2467 Chatt
Judgement Date : 13 April, 2022
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 442 of 2015
Sajjan Kumar Sahu S/o Late Manglu Ram Sahu, Aged About 66
Years Ex-Army Service Man, R/o. Village Pawni Post Pawni, P.
S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District - Balodabazar-Bhatapara
Chhattisgarh.
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Indubhushan Padwar S/o Shri Uttam Dash Padwar, Ex-Sarpanch
Of Village Panchayat-Pawni, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
2. Raju Sahu S/o Manharan Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
3. Santram Sahu S/o Abhayram Sahu R/o Village Pawni, And
Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S.
Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
4. Smt. Pin Bai Sahu W/o Ram Charan Sahu, R/o Village Pawni,
And Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P.
S. Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
5. Munna Lal Sahu S/o Ashalram Sahu, At Present Up - Sarpanch
Of Village Panchayat - Pawni, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
6. Kalas Ram Sahu S/o Chaitram Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And
Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S.
Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
7. Balram Sahu S/o Maniram Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
8. Ashok Sahu S/o Asharam Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
9. Ramlal Sahu S/o Sahettar Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
10.Ramkripal Sahu S/o Johan Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And Office-
Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S. Bilaigarh,
Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District - Balodabazar-
Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
11.Lakeshwar Sahu S/o Cheduram Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And
Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S.
Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
12.Madhu Sahu S/o Ramadhar Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And
Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S.
Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
13.Ramcharan Sahu S/o Budhram Sahu, R/o Village Pawni, And
Office-Bearers Of Village Panchayat Pawni, Post Pawni P. S.
Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue Circle Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
14. Anupam Tiwari Sub-Divisional Officer Of Bilaigarh District -
Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
15.Shankar Dayal Mishra Tahsildar Bilaigarh, Tahsil And Revenue
Circle Bilaigarh, District - Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
16.Laxman Dayal Giri Sub Inspector, Presently Posted As Incharge
Of Police Station Bilaigarh, Tahsil Bilaigarh, District - Balodabazar
- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : None. For Respondents No.1 to 3 : Mr. Rajkumar Pali, Advocate. For Respondents No.4 to 16 : None.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel Judgment on Board
13.04.2022
1. Heard.
2. Learned Counsel for Respondents No.1 to 3 submits that Writ Petition(227) No.432/2014 has finally been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 04.12.2015, therefore, this petition has now become infructuous.
3. Taking into consideration the submission put forth by learned Counsel for Respondents No.1 to 3 and further considering that no one appears on behalf of the Petitioner even when the matter is called in second round. This Court has left with no other option except to dismiss the case for want of prosecution.
4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Shubham
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!