Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr vs Ku.Sarita @ Savita And Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 2076 Chatt

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2076 Chatt
Judgement Date : 31 August, 2021

Chattisgarh High Court
State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr vs Ku.Sarita @ Savita And Ors on 31 August, 2021
             HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
                              FA No. 179 of 2014
       1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Dist. Rajnandgaon
          C.G.
       2. The Executive Engineer Mongara Barrage Project, Water Resources
          Division Dongargaon, Dist. Rajnandgaon C.G.
                                                                ---- Appellants
                                   Versus
       1. Ku.Sarita @ Savita D/o Late Sukhram Aged About 18 Years
       2. Rohit Kumar S/o Late Sukhram Aged About 10 Years
       3. Ku. Sarasvati D/o Late Sukhram Aged About 8 Years
         No. 2 & 3 represented Through Their Vali Guardian Smt. Sankay
         Bai, Wd/o Late Mehatru, aged about 65 years,
       4. Smt. Sankay Bai Wd/o Late Mehatru Aged About 65 Years
         No. 1 to 4 all R/o Village Durretola, Tah. And Thana Ambagarh
         Chowki, Dist. Rajnandgaon C.G.
       5. The Executive Engineer (Sanchar And Sudhar) C.G. Electricity
         Board, Dongargaon, Dist. Rajnandgaon C.G.
                                                               ---- Respondents

Through Video Conference

31.08.2021 Shri Raghvendra Verma, G.A. for the Appellants/State.

Shri Saurabh Sahu, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri

Malay Shrivastava, counsel for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

Respondent No.4 is reported to be died on 14.6.2016.

None for Respondent No.5, though served.

Heard on I.A.Nos.1/2014, an application for grant of stay.

It is contended by Shri Verma, learned counsel for the Appellants that for execution of the impugned judgment and

decree, the executing court has directed for issuance of attachment

of movable properties, while directing for listing of the matter on 3 rd

September, 2021, and in the event of execution of the impugned

judgment and decree, an irreparable loss would cause to the

Appellants and prays for staying the effect and operation of the

impugned judgment and decree dated 03.9.2014 passed in C.S.

No.07-B/2011 pending decision of this appeal.

No reply has been filed with regard to the said application.

On due consideration, I am inclined to allow the same.

The application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that

the effect and operation of the impugned judgment and decree

dated 03.9.2014 passed by the Additional District Judge(FTC),

Rajnandgaon(CG) in Civil Suit No.07-B/2011, shall remain stayed

until further orders, subject to the Appellants' depositing 75% of the

decreetal amount as passed by the Court below within a period of

one month from today before the concerned executing court.

Respondent Nos. 1 to 3/Claimants shall be entitled to

withdraw the same as per the directions of the executing court.

It is made clear that if any of the conditions is violated then

this interim order shall lose its efficacy and the judgment and

decree under appeal shall become executable forthwith.

I.A.No.1/2014, thus, stands disposed.

In view of the above, I.A.No.3/2021, an application for urgent

hearing also stands disposed of.

Sd/-

(Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge

sunita

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter