Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Madhubanti Chakraborty vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2024 Latest Caselaw 5181 Cal

Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 5181 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 October, 2024

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)

Madhubanti Chakraborty vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 7 October, 2024

Author: Jay Sengupta

Bench: Jay Sengupta

                            HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
                        CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
                                APPELLATE SIDE

Present:
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE JAY SENGUPTA

                                    WPA 24744 of 2024

                                Madhubanti Chakraborty
                                           Vs.
                             The State of West Bengal & Ors.

For the petitioner              :   Ms. Pramiti Bandopadhyay
                                    Mr. Rahul Kr. Sing
                                    Mr. Subhajit Das

For the State                   :   Mr. Dipanjan Datta, Ld. Sr. Govt. Adv.

Heard on                    :       07.10.2024

Judgment on                 :       07.10.2024

JAY SENGUPTA, J:


1.     This is an application, inter alia, praying for release of House Rent

Allowance, current and arrears, in favour of the petitioner.



2.     Affidavit of service filed on behalf of the petitioner is taken on record.



3.     Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows.

The petitioner is an approved Assistant Teacher at Baidyapara High School at Kolkata

currently and previously she was working as Assistant Teacher at Uttar Kusum High

School, South 24 Parganas. The husband of the petitioner being an employee of a

private company is receiving House Rent Allowance (HRA) as a separate engagement.
 The District Inspector of Schools (S.E.), South 24-Parganas & Kolkata, relying on the

Memorandum of the Finance Department (Audit Branch), Government of West Bengal

bearing No.5839-F(P) dated July, 09, 2012 and the Corrigendum Memorandum thereto

bearing    No.8012-F(p2)/FA/O/2m/     206/17(N.B.)   dated   December     27,   2018,

stopped the payment of HRA to the petitioner. A Coordinate Bench of this Court

by the judgment dated March 16, 2021 passed in WPA 1389 of 2018 (Mousumi

Biswas & Ors. State of West Bengal & Ors.) has quashed the aforementioned

memorandum of 2018. An appeal being MAT 1023 of 2021 (The State of West Bengal

& Ors. vs. Mita Majumder & Ors.) against the said judgment and order of the said

Coordinate Bench is pending. But, no order of stay has been passed in the said

appeal. Relying on       this judgment, relief   has been granted to a similarly

circumstanced Assistant Teacher by an order dated 21.05.2024 passed in WPA

14006 of 2024. In view of the same, the petitioner would be entitled to full HRA along

with interest on the arrears.



4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State denies the allegations

made in the writ petition and submits that if, at all, any relief is granted to the

petitioner, the same has to be subject to the decision of the appeal being MAT

1023 of 2021.



5. It appears that the above-referred memorandum of 2018 were quashed            by a

Coordinate Bench of this Court. However, an appeal is pending over the issue.
 But, no stay has been granted in the said appeal. Relying on the said decision,

another           Coordinate            Bench            of           this      Court        has

granted    appropriate    relief   in    favour     of    similarly     circumstanced   Assistant

Teacher.



6. In the present facts which are quite similar, I find no reason to take a

different view.



7. Therefore, the concerned respondent authorities are directed to release

the HRA, both current and arrear, in favour of the petitioner, the arrear thereof

be paid to the petitioner with interest @ 6% per annum from the date on which it

became payable till the date of payment. Such payment shall be made within a

period of six weeks from the date of communication of this order.

8. It is, however, made clear that the payment of HRA in terms of this order

is subject to the result of the above referred pending appeal.

9. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of.

10. As affidavits were not called for, allegations contained in the writ petition

are deemed not to have been admitted.

11. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the

parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Jay Sengupta, J)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter