Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 2673 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2024
OCD 16
ORDER SHEET
EC/283/2023
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
COMMERCIAL DIVISION
GAURAV CHURIWAL
VS
CONCRETE DEVELOPERS LLP AND ORS .
BEFORE:
The Hon'ble JUSTICE SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA
Date: 22nd August, 2024.
Appearance:
Mr. Ratnanko Banerji, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Kumarjit Banerjee, Adv.
Ms. Sanchari Chakraborty, Adv.
Ms. Tanishka Khundelwal, Adv.
. . .for the petitioner.
Mr. Sabyasachi Chowdhury, Adv.
Mr. Sayantan Bose, Adv.
Mr. Shounak Mukhopadhyay, Adv.
Ms. Manisha Das, Adv.
. . .for the judgment-debtors.
The Court: Learned counsel appearing for the award-debtors submits that
Special Leave Petitions have been preferred against the orders of this Court
dismissing the award-debtors' appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996. Accordingly, an adjournment for a fortnight is prayed for
on behalf of the award debtors.
Learned senior counsel appearing for the award-holder contends that a
similar plea was advanced by the award-debtors on August 6, 2024, when the
matter was last taken up. However, till date no order has been brought from the
Supreme Court by the award-debtors. Accordingly, learned senior counsel
contends that an injunction order should at least be passed with regard to the
assets disclosed in the affidavit of asset.
Leave is granted to the award-debtors to file the affidavit of assets of
award-debtor nos. 4 and 5 in course of the day. The affidavit of asset of the
award debtor nos. 2, 3, 6 and 7 filed today be kept on record.
In view of the previous dismissal of the appeals under Section 37, the
award-debtors are restrained by an order of injunction from dealing with and/or
disposing of the shares disclosed in the affidavit of assets filed by the award
debtor no. 2 to the extent of Rs.6 crores till September 30, 2024 or until further
order, whichever is earlier.
The matter shall next be listed on September 5, 2024 to enable the award-
debtors to obtain orders in connection with the pending SLPs in the meantime. It
is made clear that in the event no such order is passed in the meantime in the
connected SLPs, appropriate orders shall be passed on the next returnable date.
Learned counsel appearing for the award-debtors submits that the flat
disclosed in the affidavit of assets of the award-debtor no.1-Firm is in occupation
of the award-holders. An injunction is sought in respect of the said property as
well.
However, in view of the fact that it is the appeals of the of the award-
debtors under Section 37 which were dismissed by this Court, I do not find any
scope of grant of any injunction on the prayer of the award debtors in respect of
the property in question at this juncture. Accordingly, such prayer is refused.
(SABYASACHI BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
SP/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!