Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Chandra Pal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2023 Latest Caselaw 6974 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6974 Cal
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Chandra Pal vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 11 October, 2023
11.10.2023             IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
  DL-156             CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
   (PP)                     APPELLATE SIDE
                            WPA 23472 of 2023

                      Subhas Chandra Pal @ Subhash
                           Chandra Pal
                                   Vs.
                      The State of West Bengal & Ors.

                  Mr. Golam Mohammad
                                               ....for the petitioner.

                  Ms. Deblina Chattaraj,
                  Ms. Angana Dutta
                                                      .....for WBTCL.


                  Affidavit of service filed in Court today is

             retained with the records.

                     The writ petitioner was a permanent employee

             of the West Bengal Transport        Corporation     Limited

             (in short 'the WBTCL') previously known as the

             Calcutta     Tramways Company (1978) Limited. The

             writ petitioner retired from his service on October 31,

             2017.

                     The writ petitioner prays for interest on delayed

             disbursement     of   retiral   dues.   The   retiral   dues

             aggregating Rs.5,18,236/- was disbursed to the

             petitioner on January 2, 2018 and also a sum of

             Rs.17,27,171/- as retiral dues was disbursed on

             January 6, 2018.

                     The issue of payment of interest on delayed

             payment of retiral benefits has been considered by the
                      2




Hon'ble Supreme Court in two judgments reported in

2021 (11) SCC 543 (State of Andhra Pradesh & Anr.

Vs. Dinavahi Lakshmi Kameswari) and also in 2022

(4) SCC 627 (Dr. A. Selvaraj Vs. CBM College &

Ors.). In Selvaraj (supra) it was held that the delay in

payment of retiral benefits was due to no fault on the

part of the petitioner. It was an obligation on the part

of the employer to process the retiral benefits and pay

the same within one month of the date of the

petitioner's retirement. Since the payment was not

made within one month, the interest was held to date

back to the petitioner's date of retirement.

      Following the aforesaid judgements of the Apex

Court and also the judgement passed by Co-ordinate

Bench of this Hon'ble Court in WPO No.2279 of 2022

(Swapan Kumar Das vs. The State of West Bengal),

this Court holds that interest at the rate of 6 per cent

per annum on Rs.5,18,236/- should be paid by the

respondent company to the petitioner from November

1, 2017 (the date succeeding the date of retirement) to

January 2, 2018, (the date on which the retiral

benefits have actually been paid) and on

Rs.17,27,171/- from November 1, 2017 (the date

succeeding the date of retirement) to January 6, 2018,

(the date on which the retiral benefits have actually

been paid) for late disbursement of post retiral

benefits within three months from date. In the event

there is any default in payment of interest within the

stipulated period, the rate of interest will stand

increased to 10 per cent per annum being the rate

payable at present under the Payment of Gratuities

Act, 1972.

The petitioner is entitled to claim such interest. A

beneficial reference may be made to an

order/judgment passed by the Hon'ble Division Bench

in F.M.A. 3942 of 2016 (Amarnath Tiwari & Ors. vs.

State of West Bengal & Ors.). This Court is of the

view that the laws of limitation are not applicable in

exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the

Constitution of India relying on a judgment passed by

the Apex Court reported in 2022 Live Law (SC) 785

(State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. O.P. Gupta). It has

also been held in the said decision that the Court

cannot be oblivious to the difficulties of a retired

employee in approaching the Court, which could

include financial constraints.

Since affidavits have not been invited in the

present writ petition, the allegations made in the writ

petition are deemed not to have been admitted by the

parties.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition,

being WPA 23472 of 2023 is disposed of.

All parties are to act on a server copy of this

order downloaded from the official website of this

Hon'ble Court.

Urgent certified website copies of this order, if

applied for, be made available to the parties subject to

compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Lapita Banerji, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter