Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Tarapada Mondal vs Moloy Kanta Murmu
2023 Latest Caselaw 4532 Cal

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4532 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2023

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Tarapada Mondal vs Moloy Kanta Murmu on 28 July, 2023

28.07.2023 DL-223 (pp) CPAN 417 of 2023 in WPA 5549 of 2016

Tarapada Mondal Vs.

Moloy Kanta Murmu

With

CPAN 418 of 2023 in WPA 5549 of 2016

Rajesh Kumar Tripathi Vs.

Moloy Kanta Murmu

Ms. Arpita Saha ....for the applicants/petitioners.

Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee, AGP, Mr. Somnath Naskar ...for the alleged contemnor.

In Re: CPAN 417 of 2023

By a judgment and order dated August 26, 2022,

this Court directed the Director of School Education

to consider the petitioners' representation by taking

into account the revised staff pattern that was

submitted on June 9, 2005 before the State

Government for approval of sponsorship for the post

of Peon.

The Director of Mass Education Extension

passed a reasoned order dated November 7, 2022. In

the reasoned order it has been held that the staff

pattern mentioned in the order dated December 21,

2004 is manufactured document and there was no

vacant post of Peon available on that date. However,

there is no discussion with regard to the staff pattern

submitted by the school on June 9, 2005. There is

also no discussion about the fact that why despite the

communication dated February 10, 2006 issued by

the State Government for appointment of a Peon who

was a "Madhyamik Pass" candidate, the candidature

of Sri Tarapada Mondal was not considered.

Mr. Mukherjee, learned Additional Government

Pleader appears for the alleged contemnor and

submits that the said application is not maintainable

since pursuant to the order dated August 26, 2022

the reasoned decision was taken.

This Court, prima facie, finds despite the fact

that a reasoned decision has been taken, the facts

which this Court directed to be taken note of were not

considered in the reasoned order. Furthermore, the

reasons for non-consideration of the said facts have

also not been discussed.

Therefore, this Court directs the alleged

contemnor to file an affidavit explaining why the

directions passed by the Court on August 26, 2022

were not complied with while passing the reasoned

order.

Let such affidavit be filed by August 18, 2023.

Let the matter appear for further consideration

under the same heading "Contempt Application" on

August 25, 2023.

In Re: CPAN 418 of 2023

By a judgment and order dated August 26, 2022,

this Court directed the Director of School Education

to consider the petitioners' representation by taking

into account the revised staff pattern that was

submitted on June 9, 2005 before the State

Government for approval of sponsorship for the post

of Hostel Warden.

The Director of Mass Education Extension

passed a reasoned order dated November 7, 2022. In

the reasoned order it has been held that the staff

pattern mentioned in the order dated December 21,

2004 is manufactured document and there was no

vacant post of Hostel Warden available on that date.

However, there is no discussion with regard to the

staff pattern submitted by the school on June 9,

2005. There is also no discussion about the fact that

why despite the communication dated February 10,

2006 issued by the State Government for

appointment of a Hostel Warden who was a

"Madhyamik Pass" candidate, the candidature of Sri

Rakesh Kumar Tripathi was not considered.

Mr. Mukherjee, learned Additional Government

Pleader appears for the alleged contemnor and

submits that the said application is not maintainable

since pursuant to the order dated August 26, 2022

the reasoned decision was taken.

This Court, prima facie, finds despite the fact

that a reasoned decision has been taken, the fact

which this Court directed to be taken note of was not

considered in the reasoned order. Furthermore, the

reason for non-consideration of the said fact have also

not been discussed.

Therefore, this Court directs the alleged

contemnor to file an affidavit explaining why the

directions passed by the Court on August 26, 2022

were not complied with while passing the reasoned

order.

Let such affidavit be filed by August 18, 2023.

Let the matter appear for further consideration

under the same heading "Contempt Application" on

August 25, 2023.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this

order duly downloaded from the official website of this

Hon'ble Court.

(Lapita Banerji, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter