Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 73 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 January, 2023
03.01.2023
Item No.14
Court No.6.
S. De
F.A. 99 of 2021
Smt. Molly Dey.
Vs
Sri Gautam Dey & Ors.
Mr. Gautam Chakraborty,
Mr. Kartik Kumar Ray
...for the appellant.
Mr. Asis Chandra Bagchi,
Ms. Malayshree Maity,
Mr. Somak Lahiri,
...for the respondent no.1.
Ms. Sanjana Chakraborty, ...for the respondent no.2.
This first appeal is directed against a judgment
and order dated February 8, 2021 whereby a partition
suit filed by the respondent no.1 herein was decreed in
preliminary form.
Learned counsel for the appellant/defendant
no.1 vehemently argued that the suit is not
maintainable for several reasons. We are not
immediately recording his arguments. We find that
the dispute is between cousins. There is definitely an
element of settlement in the matter and we are of the
opinion that the parties should try and settle the
matter out of Court.
If the appellant/defendant no.1, according to
whom the property in question has already been
partitioned by a registered deed of partition, is
desirous of selling her share, she should offer her
share first to the plaintiff and the proforma defendants
in accordance with law and the plaintiff and the
proforma defendents should consider such offer
earnestly.
Let the matter stand adjourned and be listed
again on February 6, 2023 under the same heading.
We ardently hope that on the next date learned
advocates for the parties will be in a position to inform
us that the parties have settled the matter amicably.
(Apurba Sinha Ray, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!