Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5694 Cal
Judgement Date : 29 August, 2023
D/L38 C.R.R.3222 of 2023 29.08.2023
Bpg.
Murli Manohar Chandak @ Murli M. Chandak Versus Sanatan Chowdhury
Mr. Ayan Bhattacherjee Mr. Shounak Mondal Mr. Suman Majumder Mr. Cedric Fernandez.
...for the petitioner.
Mr. Anwar Hossain Ms. Ratna Ghosh.
...for the State.
Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of the revisional
application upon the opposite party by speed post with
acknowledgement due and file affidavit-of-service on the next date
fixed for hearing.
Having regard to the fact that the subject matter of
challenge in the present revisional application relates to the
judgment and order passed by the learned Additional District and
Sessions Judge, 1st Fast Track Court, Bichar Bhawan, Calcutta in
Criminal Appeal No.232 of 2019 wherein the judgment and order
dated 22.08.2019 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate,
11th Court, Calcutta was affirmed, I direct the petitioner to deposit a
sum of Rs.15,00,000/- with the learned Metropolitan Magistrate,
11th Court, Calcutta in connection with Complaint Case No.5389 of
2000 (T.R. No.448 of 2002) within a period of four weeks from date.
On deposit of such amount of Rs.15,00,000/-, the learned
Metropolitan Magistrate, 11th Court, Calcutta will not proceed with
the execution of the case.
Matter be listed under the heading "To Be Mentioned" on
21st September, 2023.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly
downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!