Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5626 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 August, 2023
28.08. 2023
item No.4
n.b.
ct. no. 551 FMA 407 of 2009
with
IA No. CAN 3 of 2011(Old No. CAN 10567 of 2011)
National Insurance Co. Ltd.
Vs.
Basiran Bibi & Ors.
Mr. Parimal Kumar Pahari,
.....for the appellant.
Ms. Chittapriya Shah,
Ms. Priyanka Saha,
.... For the respondent.
This appeal has been preferred against the
judgment dated 15th March, 2008 passed by the learned
Judge, 1st Court, Birbhum, Suri in M.A.C. Case No.116 of
2005.
An innocuous prayer was made on behalf of the
appellant/insurance company before this Appellate Court.
It was argued by Mr. Pahari, learned advocate that the
deceased was a gratuitous passenger; on such
observation, the learned Tribunal has directed the
insurance company to pay the compensation and in the
same award the insurance company has given a liberty to
realize the amount from the owner i.e.opposite party no.1
through a separate execution proceedings.
Mr. Pahari, learned advocate for the insurance
company submitted that the law has been settled by the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in several matters such as Baljit
Kaur, Challa Bharathamma and Swaran Singh, wherein
it has been specified that the separate execution
proceedings to recover the amount of compensation from
the owner is not required.
Considering the same, the insurance company
preferred this appeal for necessary order.
Learned advocate for the respondent/claimant
submitted before this Court that the claimants are not
getting the compensation since the date of accident i.e.
since 2005 but the order has been made but, which was
not received due to the pendency of the appeal.
Heard the learned advocate for the insurance
company and also perused the judgment of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Challa Bharathamma it appears to me
by virtue of the judgment passed by the Hon'ble Supreme
Court in Challa Bharallamna the separate execution
proceeding is not necessary to initiate by the insurance
company to recover the amount from the owner.
Considering the same, the order impugned passed
by the learned Tribunal is modified to the effect that the
insurance company is at liberty to recover the
compensation amount from the owner of the offending
vehicle according to the direction given by the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in Challa Bharathamma.
The learned advocate for the insurance company
has submitted the entire awarded amount has already
been deposited with the office of the learned Registrar
General, High Court, Calcutta, so, necessary order may be
passed, so that the claimant/respondent may receive such
amount.
Heard Mr. Pahari, learned advocate, it appears that
the initial statutory deposit of Rs.25,000/- was made by
the insurance company vide challan no.1843 dated 25 th
September, 2008 and, thereafter a sum of Rs.3,26,000/-
has been deposited vide challan no.2388 dated
12.12.2008.
Considering the same, it appears that the entire
amended amount has been deposited with the office of the
learned Registrar General, High Court, Calcutta, which
must have accrued some interests. The claimants are at
liberty to receive the compensation amount alongwith
accrued interest according to the direction and share as
ordered by the learned Tribunal in the impugned award.
Accordingly, FMA 407 of 2009 is disposed of.
Connected applications, if any, are also disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
( Subhendu Samanta, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!