Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5352 Cal
Judgement Date : 21 August, 2023
21.08.2023 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Ct. no.654 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
D/L 60
ab ,,
FMA 158 of 2023
With
CAN 1 of 2023
,
The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.
Vs.
Tapasi Samanta & Ors.
,,
Mr. Sanjay Paul
... for the appellant-Insurance company
Mr. Subhankar Mandal
... for the respondent nos. 1to 4-claimants
Re : FMA 158 of 2023
This appeal is preferred against the judgment and
award dated 6th September, 2022 passed by the learned
Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track
Court-II, Howrah in M.A.C. Case No. 209 of 2015 under
Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
As per report of the Additional Stamp Reporter
dated 13th March, 2023, the appeal is preferred within the
statutory period of limitation.
Accordingly, the appeal is formally admitted and
registered.
Mr. Sanjay Paul, learned advocate for the appellant-
insurance company submits that the appeal relates to a
short point regarding deduction towards personal and
leaving expenses of the deceased. He submits for
expeditious disposal of the appeal.
Mr. Paul, learned advocate for the appellant-
insurance company further submits that all the relevant
papers are with him and as such, calling for of lower
court records be dispensed with at present and he
undertakes to prepare informal paper books.
Mr. Subhankar Mandal, learned advocate for the
respondent nos. 1 to 4-claimants concurs with such
submissions.
In view of submissions advanced on behalf of the
appellant-insurance company, calling for of lower court
records is dispensed with for the time being.
Learned advocate for the appellant-insurance
company is directed to prepare and file requisite of
informal paper books incorporating all relevant papers
and documents including the pleadings and evidence,
both oral and documentary, in printed or typewritten or
cyclostyled form, as the case may be, out of court, within
a week from date.
Mr. Paul, learned advocate for the appellant-
Insurance Company also submits for dispensing with
service of notice of appeal upon the respondent No. 5,
owner of the offending vehicle, since he did not contest
the claim application. It is found from the impugned
judgment that the respondent No. 5-owner of the
offending vehicle did not contest the claim application
and the same has been disposed of ex parte against him.
In the aforesaid backdrop, service of notice of appeal
upon the respondent No. 5-owner of the offending vehicle
stands dispensed with.
Since the respondent nos. 1 to 4-claimants have
already entered appearance, service of notice of appeal
upon the said respondents also stands dispensed with.
Let the matter appear under the heading "Hearing"
on 31st August, 2023 at the top.
< (Bivas Pattanayak, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!