Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4975 Cal
Judgement Date : 11 August, 2023
11.08.2023
Item No.11
gd/ssd
MAT/1111/2023
IA NO: CAN/1/2023
NIKUNJ DROLIA
VS
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-30(1),
KOLKATA AND ORS.
Ms. Akshara Shukla
..for the Appellant.
Ms. Smita Das De
..for the Respondent.
1. This intra court appeal is directed against
the order passed by the learned Single Bench dated 5th
June, 2023 in WPA 9158 of 2023.
2. The appellant had challenged the reopening
of the assessment for the assessment year 2017 under
the provisions of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. The learned Single Bench had taken note of
the facts and circumstances and in particular that an
assessment order has already been passed under
Section 147 of the Act and declined to entertain the
writ petition.
4. We have elaborately heard the learned
advocate for the appellant who strenuously contends
that the substantial objection which was raised by the
assessee in his reply dated 02.03.2022 in response with
the notice issued under Section 148A(b) of the Act was
not considered and none of the facts were dealt with by
the assessing officer while passing the order dated
23.07.2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Act.
Therefore, it is submitted that the matter should be
remanded back to the assessing officer to consider the
reply given by the assessee in a proper perspective.
5. As could be seen from the reply to the show
cause notice the assessee has not only mentioned
about the absence of evidence being provided, the
assessee has also furnished information to state that
the proposal to reopen the assessment was incorrect
assessment of facts and this aspect has been dealt with
by the assessing officer and more particularly, while
passing the assessment order under Section 147 of the
Act dated 29.05.2023. Thus, the matter has travelled
to the stage of assessment order and necessarily the
assessee has to establish his case by placing facts
before the appellate authority and at this juncture the
question of interfering with the order passed under
Section 148A(d) of the Act would not arise.
6. For the above reason, the order passed in
the writ petition is confirmed and the appeal is
dismissed.
7. However, we make it clear that the
dismissal of the appeal and the writ petition will not
preclude the appellant from raising all grounds in the
statutory appeal to be filed against the assessment
order dated 29.05.2023 in which the appellant would
be entitled to contest that the reopening of the
assessment itself is bad in law. All such contentions
shall be decided by the appellate authority
uninfluenced by any observation made by the learned
writ court or by this court in this judgment and order.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!