Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2245 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 23 August, 2023
OD-10
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
APOT/208/2023
IA NO: GA/2/2023
UNIVERSAL ENTERPRISES LIMITED
VS
INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(2) & ORS.
BEFORE :
THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAM
And
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 23rd August, 2023
Appearance :
Ms. Swapna Das, Adv.
...for appellant
Mr. Om Narayan Rai, Adv.
Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, Adv.
...for respondent
The Court : - This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioners is
directed against the order passed by the learned Single Bench in WPO
No. 1022 of 2023, dated May 17, 2023. The writ petition was allowed
holding that the appellant being aggrieved by an order of assessment
passed by the Assessing Officer has to necessarily file an appeal.
Ms. Swapna Das, learned Advocate appearing for the appellant,
would vehemently contend that the reopening of the assessment is
hopelessly time-barred and this aspect of the matter has not been
specifically dealt with by the Learned Writ Court in the impugned order
and therefore aggrieved by the same the appellant has preferred this
appeal.
We have heard Mr. Om Narayan Rai, learned standing Counsel
appearing with Mr. Prithu Dudhoria, learned Advocate for the
respondents.
The Assessing Officer issued show-cause notice dated May 26,
2022 under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act)
proposing to reopen the assessment for the relevant assessment year
namely, A.Y. 2015-16. The reasons based on which the assessment was
proposed to be reopened was mentioned in the show-cause notice. The
assessee submitted their reply/objection pointing that the re-assessment
proceedings is time-barred. Apart from that the assessee had also set out
certain averments on the merits of the matter, which could be seen from
paragraph 4 of the reply dated June 9, 2022. The Assessing Officer
passed order under Section 148A(d), dated 23rd July, 2022 and has dealt
with the issue regarding the plea of limitation by stating that in terms of
the provisions of taxation and other laws amendment Act, the period of
limitation for issuance of the reopening notice stood extended to 30th
June, 2021 and therefore, the reopening proceedings is not barred by
time. Apart from that, other findings were also recorded by the Assessing
Officer. Thereafter, a show-cause notice was issued on April 26, 2023
proposing certain variations. For such show-cause notice, the assessee
sent a reply not on merits but with a request to keep the proceedings in
abeyance since the writ petition was filed by the appellant. However, the
assessment order has been passed by the Assessing Officer dated May
26, 2023.
In the light of the stand taken by the Assessing Officer with regard
to the plea of limitation by referring to the decision of the Hon'ble
Supreme Court in the case of Union of India & Ors. vs. Ashish Agarwal,
correctness of the same is required to be decided before the appropriate
appellate authority and not by a writ court as the question of limitation
arisen in the instant case is a mixed question of fact and law.
Therefore, it is appropriate for the appellant to file an appeal as
against the assessment order dated May 26, 2023. In the appeal that the
appellant may file, the appellant would be at liberty to raise the plea of
limitation, which will be considered by the appellate authority.
In the light of the above, we are not inclined to interfere with the
order passed by the Learned Single Bench and we direct the appellant to
file a statutory appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)
and if such appeal is filed within 30 days from the date of receipt of the
server copy of this order and judgment, the appeal shall not be rejected
on the ground of limitation but shall be entertained by the said appellate
authority.
The appellant will be entitled to raise the plea that the entire
reopening proceedings is time-barred apart from raising other plea on the
merits of the matter and the appellate authority shall decide the plea of
limitation as fast among the several issues which will fall for
consideration.
With the above observation, the appeal is dismissed.
The stay application being IA NO: GA/2/2023 is also dismissed.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
SN/SD.
AR(CR)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!