Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7497 Cal
Judgement Date : 11 November, 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION
APPELLATE SIDE
Present :-
Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarathi Sen
W.P. No. 5519(W) of 2018
Tandra Maity(Das).
-Versus-
State Of West Bengal & Ors.
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sabyasachi Mondal, Adv.
For the State : Ms. Chaitali Bhattacharya, Adv.
: Mr. Kartick Chandra Kapas,Adv.
Heard on: : 10.11.2022
Judgment on. : 11.11.2022
PARTHA SARATHI SEN, J. : -
1. By filing the instant writ petition the writ petitioner has prayed for an
appropriate order directing the respondents to disburse a sum of Rs.37,035/-
for the period 1st July 2012 to 31st March, 2014 and another sum of Rs.
4,80,356/- towards her arrear claim as accrued on and from 01.08.1989 to
31.12.2013.
2. It has been contended by the writ petitioner that after being appointed as
an assistant teacher the respondents/State Authorities had sanctioned her
higher scale of pay as well as post graduate scale. It is the further case of the
petitioner that all of a sudden on 01.11.,2013, respondents/State Authorities
intimated the writ petitioner that the higher scale of pay of the writ petitioner
as has been fixed was not in order and accordingly the writ petitioner finding
no other alternative refunded a sum of Rs.4,80,356/- to the respondent
authorities. It is the further case of the petitioner that subsequently on
19.03.2014, the respondents authorities refixed her pay with effect from
12.07.2012 at Rs.29,090/- with effect from 01.07.2012, and in accordance
with such fixation the school authority, where the writ petitioner was
employed, submitted arrear claim of the writ petitioner to the tune of
Rs.37,035/- and Rs.4,80,356/- as has been refunded by the writ petitioner for
the periods mentioned hereinabove. It is the further case of the writ petitioner
that under cover of letter dated 11.05.2015, the respondents/State Authority
intimated the school authority, where the writ petitioner was employed, that
the petitioner's claim to the tune of Rs.4,80,356/- is admissible. It is
contended that in spite of issuance of such letter the above mentioned arrear
claims were never disbursed in favour of the present writ petitioner and thus
finding no other alternative the petitioner has approached this Court for the
reliefs as mentioned above and as specifically mentioned in the prayer portion
of the writ petition.
3. On perusal of the entire materials and after hearing the learned advocates
of both sides this Court found no cogent reason on the part of the respondents
State Authorities to withhold the claim of the writ petitioner.
4. In view of the circumstances as stated hereinabove the District Inspector
of Schools (SE), Purba Medinipur is hereby directed to release a sum of
Rs.37,035/- in favour of the present writ petitioner together with interest at
the rate of 5 % with effect from 01.07.2012 till actual payment. The respondent
no.3 District Inspector of Schools, Purba Medinipur is further directed to
release a sum of Rs.4,80,356/- in favour of the writ petitioner together with
interest at the rate of 6 % per annum with effect from 27.12.2013. It is further
ordered that respondent no.3 i.e the District Inspector of Schools (SE) Purba
Medinipur and respondent no.4 i.e Treasury Officer, Tamluk, District Purba
Medinipur are to take immediate steps so that the necessary disbursement can
be made within four weeks from the date of communication of this order. With
the aforementioned observation the W.P No. 5519 0f 2018 is disposed of.
5. Department is directed to send a copy of this judgement to the Principal
Secretary, School Education Department, Government of West Bengal, Bikash
Bhavan, Kolkata 700091 forthwith.
6. Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Government of West
Bengal, Bikash Bhavan, Kolkata 700091 is hereby requested to ensure that
the order as passed by this Court is duly complied with by the District
Inspector of Schools, School Education, Purba Medinipur as well as Treasury
Officer, District Purba Medinipur within the time framed.
7. Let a copy of this judgement along with LCR be sent down at once.
8. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this judgement, if applied for, be given
to the parties on completion of usual formalities.
(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!