Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 4837 Cal
Judgement Date : 28 July, 2022
Form J(1) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
Criminal Revisional Jurisdiction
Appellate Side
Present :
The Hon'ble Justice Bibek Chaudhuri
I.A. No : CRAN/1/2022
In
C.R.R. 2221 of 2022
Kanahaiya Mishra & Ors.
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Anr.
For the petitioner : Mr. Amitabha Ghosh, Adv.
For Private O.P. : Mr. Bandhu Brata Bhula, Adv.
Mr. Ranajit Roy, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Saswata Gopal Mukherjee, Ld.P.P.
Ms.Faria Hossain, Adv.
Mr. Anand Keshari, Adv.
Heard on : 28.07.2022
Judgment On : 28.07.2022.
Bibek Chaudhuri, J.
It is submitted by the learned Public Prosecutor that the
petitioners have not served a copy of the application in his office. On
the other hand, a copy of the application was sent to the Officer-in-
Charge of the jurisdictional police station with a direction of this Court
dated 11th July, 2022 and the Officer-in-Charge of the said Police
Station has already submitted his report. Mr. Keshari, learned
Advocate assisting the learned Public Prosecutor has submitted the
report. Mr. Ghosh, learned Advocate for the petitioners is requested
to hand over a copy of the application to the learned Public
Prosecutor, High Court, Calcutta which he has already complied in
Court.
It appears from the record that ACGR Case No.2515 of 2021
under Sections 419/420/406/120B of the Indian Penal Code pending
before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Alipore arising
out of Patuli Police Station Case No.108 of 2021 dated 6 th July, 2021
is at present pending for disposal. During pendency of the said case
the parties have arrived at a compromise. A joint petition of
compromise has been filed by the parties being CRAN 1 of 2022.
I am in conformity that the alleged offence is compoundable in
nature. More so, it is ascertained from the reports submitted by the
Officer-in-Charge, Patuli Police Station that the de-facto complainant
preferred a revision being WPA 17330 of 2021 where she admitted
that entire dispute between parties has been resolved with the
intervention of the police authorities.
In view of such circumstances, this Court is empowered under
Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to record compromise
and dispose of the instant revision in accordance with law.
In view of the joint compromise petition filed by the de-facto
complainant and the opposite party/accused and considering the
submissions made by the learned Advocate for the de-facto
complainant that the dispute has been amicably settled, the joint
petition for compromise is accepted. In view of such compromise,
Patuli Police Station Case No.108 of 2021 corresponding to the ACGR
Case No.2515 of 2021 under Sections 419/420/406/120B of the
Indian Penal Code presently pending before the learned Additional
Chief Judicial Magistrate at Alipore be quashed.
The instant revision and the connected application being CRAN
No.1/2022 is accordingly disposed of.
The report submitted by the Officer-in-Charge, Patuli Police
Station be kept with the record.
Let a copy of this order be communicated through the learned
Advocate for the parties appearing in the Trial Court for information
and compliance by the learned Magistrate.
(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)
Mithun De/ A.R. (Ct).
Sl No.3.
D/L.
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!