Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 172 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 21 January, 2022
ORDER OD-11
APO/133/2021
With
CC/67/2019
WPO/891/2016
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
CIVIT APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER PASSED IN ITS
CONTEMPT JURISDICTION (SPECIAL JURISDICTION)
ORIGINAL SIDE
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK
(ERSTWHILE UNITED BANK OF INDIA) & ANR.
VERSUS
RAGHUNATH KARFA (SPF No.24519) & ORS.
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
THE HON'BLE JUSTICE RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ
DATE : 21ST JANUARY, 2022
[Via Video Conference]
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Samrat Sen, Senior Advocate
Mr. Abhishek Banerjee, Advocate
Ms. Parna Roy Choudhury, Advocate
...for appellants
Mr. Soumya Majumder, Advocate
Mr. Mainak Ganguly, Advocate
......for the respondents
The Court:- Learned counsel for the appellant has
pointed out that against the original order of the Learned Single Judge
setting aside the order of compulsory retirement, an appeal has been
preferred before the Division Bench which is likely to come up for hearing
when the physical hearing commences. He has submitted that if the
original order itself is set aside by the Division Bench, then nothing
would survive in this appeal and that in pursuance to the order of the
Learned Single Judge which is under challenge in this appeal, the
requisite amount has already been deposited with the concerned
Registrar. He has prayed for listing the matter after the physical hearing
commences.
List on 11th March, 2022.
(PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, C.J.)
(RAJARSHI BHARADWAJ, J.)
sm/akg
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!