Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 102 Cal
Judgement Date : 17 January, 2022
17-01-2022
ct no. 13
Sl. 11
sp
WPA 17975 of 2021
(Through Video Conference)
Shri Madhusudan Das & Ors.
-Versus-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Shyamal Kumar Das,
Mr. Ajay Barman Ray
....for the petitioners
Mr. Tapan Kumar Mukherjee,
Mr. Somnath Naskar
...for the State
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is
taken on record.
The petitioners complain that the private
respondent in violation of the order dated
September 2, 2021 passed in T.S. 131 of 2021 by
the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), 1st Court,
Contai (In-Charge), has continued to effect
construction in the disputed property.
The petitioners by reference to a judgment
of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of P.R.
Murlidharan and others vs. Swami
Dharmananda Theertha Padar and others
reported in (2006) 4 SCC 501, has submitted that
the Writ Court can enforce a Civil Court's order.
Reference is also made to a decision of a Co-
ordinate bench of this Court in Srikanta Roy vs.
State of West Bengal and others reported in
2012 (2) CLJ (Cal) 486.
This Court is of the view that the facts and
circumstances under which the said of P.R.
Murlidharan (supra) decision has been rendered,
are quite different and have no manner of
application in this instant case. The arguments of
the learned counsel for the petitioners that moving
the Civil Court under Order 39, Rule 2A is a
useless formality, cannot also be accepted by this
Court.
This Court is, therefore, of the view that the
petitioners ought to first move the Civil Court
under Order 39, Rule 2A and seek directions upon
the police for assistance in enforcing the order of
injunction.
It is made clear that in case of any
application as above is filed in the Court below by
the petitioners, the same shall be dealt with as
expeditiously as possible, by the learned Civil
Court and suitable orders for enforcement and/or
police help may be passed in accordance with law.
In that view of the matter and for availability of efficacious alternative statutory
remedy, this Court is not inclined to interfere
under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Hence, WPA 17975 of 2021 shall stand dismissed
with liberty however reserved to the petitioners as
indicated hereinabove.
There shall be no order as to costs.
All parties shall act on the server copy of
this order duly downloaded from the official
website of this Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!