Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 314 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2022
04.02.2022
sayandeep
Sl. No. 44
Ct. No. 05
WPA 16684 of 2021
[Via Video Conference]
Subir Dhali
-Versus-
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sanat Kr. Roy
Mr. Abhishek Banerjee
...... for the petitioner
Mr. Amal Kr. Sen
Mr. Lal mohan Basu
..... for the State
The petitioner has challenged an order
dated 8th October, 2020 passed by the Regional
Transport Authority, Hooghly rejecting the
application of the petitioner for Permanent
Contract Carriage Permit for Auto Rickshaw in
the concerned route on the clauses contained in a
Notification dated 29th January, 2010 of the
Transport Department, Government of West
Bengal.
Although learned counsel appearing for the
State respondent submits that the said
Notification has been upheld by a Judgment of a
learned Single Judge of this Court and which has
not been challenged till date, it is also submitted
that there are certain admitted discrepancies
between the impugned order and the Report filed
in an identical writ petition in WPA 16594 of 2021
by the State respondent in the form of an affidavit
pursuant to a direction of a coordinate Bench.
Counsel submits that due to such
discrepancies, the matter should be remanded to
the concerned Regional Transport Authority for
taking a fresh view of the matter.
WPA 16684 of 2021 is disposed of by
setting aside the impugned order dated 8th
October, 2020 and directing the Regional
Transport Authority of the concerned District to
decide the matter afresh upon hearing relevant
parties including the petitioner. The matter
should be disposed of in terms of the reasoned
order within eight weeks from today. A copy of the
reasoned order should be made available to the
petitioner within a week thereafter.
The writ petition is disposed of accordingly.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!