Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 8480 Cal
Judgement Date : 19 December, 2022
AD-09
Ct No.09
19.12.2022
TN
WPA No. 26702 of 2022
Nandalal Barui
Vs.
The Station Manager, West Bengal State Electricity
Board and others
Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya
.... for the petitioner
Mr. Debanjan Mukherji
.... for the WBSEDCL
Mr. Apratim Bhattacharya,
Mr. Souvik Chatterjee
.... for the private respondent no.5
Leave is granted to the learned Advocate-on-
record for the petitioner to carry out the necessary
amendments to the cause title of the writ petition to
implead the West Bengal State Electricity Distribution
Company Limited (WBSEDCL) as a party respondent
to the present writ petition, since two officials of the
WBSEDCL have been impleaded as respondents, but
the said Distribution Licensee itself has not been so
impleaded.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that
the petitioner is a tenant in respect of the property-in-
dispute and has been in occupation of the said
property till date. However, although a previous
electricity connection at the same premises, standing
in the name of the petitioner's father (since deceased),
was disconnected, even upon the petitioner having
made a new application for electricity connection and
having deposited the quotation amount, the
WBSEDCL is now insisting upon a Way Leave
certificate being obtained from the private
respondent/landlord.
Learned counsel for the WBSEDCL submits that
the WBSEDCL had to disconnect the previous
electricity connection standing in the name of the
petitioner's father in view of an order passed by a civil
court. Learned counsel further submits that the
WBSEDCL otherwise does not have any difficulty in
giving the new connection to the petitioner, but the
petitioner is required to obtain a Way Leave
permission from the landlord/owner.
Learned counsel appearing for the private
respondent/landlord submits that the private
respondent has already instituted an eviction suit
against the petitioner, which is now pending.
That apart, since the electricity connection in
the name of the petitioner's deceased father was
continuing in the name of the said deceased even after
his demise, the same had to be disconnected.
Upon hearing learned counsel for the parties,
the first thing which strikes the eye is that the
pendency of an eviction suit cannot be a hindrance to
an occupant of a premises getting an electricity
connection in his/her name. Section 43 of the
Electricity Act, 2003 is wide enough to contemplate
the right to get electricity connection in favour of both
the lawful and unlawful occupants, as decided in
several judgments of this court.
Whatever may be the outcome of the eviction
suit, the electricity connection, if given to the
petitioner in his name, will definitely abide by the
result of the same. However, there is no present
impediment to the petitioner getting such electricity
connection in his own name upon compliance of
formalities, which he has already done.
The lack of Way Leave permission from the
landlord cannot be a hindrance to the petitioner
getting a new electricity connection to his premises.
Accordingly, WPA No. 26702 of 2022 is disposed
of by directing the WBSEDCL to give a new electricity
connection in the name of the petitioner at the
disputed premises within a fortnight from date.
It is, however, made clear that as and when the
electricity connection is so given, the same shall not
create any special right or equity in favour of the
petitioner which the petitioner otherwise does not
have in law and shall not influence in any manner the
result of the eviction suit pending between the private
parties.
In the event the WBSEDCL personnel are
resisted by the private respondent from giving such
electricity connection to the petitioner from the
existing meter board position at the premises, it will
be open to the WBSEDCL personnel to approach the
local police station for adequate police assistance in
that regard. If so approached, the Officer-in-
Charge/Inspector-in-Charge (as applicable) of the said
police station shall give such assistance to the
WBSEDCL at the cost of the petitioner by acting on a
server copy of this order, without insisting upon prior
production of a certified copy of the same.
This court has not entered into the dispute
pending in the civil court inter se the private parties.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if
applied for, be made available to the parties upon
compliance with the requisite formalities.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!