Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Ashit Kumar Panja vs Unknown
2022 Latest Caselaw 5687 Cal

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5687 Cal
Judgement Date : 22 August, 2022

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Ashit Kumar Panja vs Unknown on 22 August, 2022
                                              1




22.8.2022

Ct-42 P.Jana CRR 495 of 2022

In re: An application under Section 482 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure;

-And-

In the matter of : Ashit Kumar Panja, ...Petitioner.

Mr. Ashit Kumar Panja, ...Petitioner-in-person.

The petitioner is the ex-husband of the wife-opposite

party no. 1.

The marriage between the parties have been dissolved

by a mutually decree of divorce passed in Matrimonial Suit

No. 502 of 2001 on June 30, 2005 by the learned Additional

District Judge, 6th Court at Midnapore (West).

Prior to the aforesaid date of dissolution of marriage,

the opposite party no. 1 filed an application under Section

125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure praying for

maintenance allowance for herself and her minor daughter.

The learned Magistrate allowed the said application by

granting maintenance in favour of the petitioner and the

minor daughter of the parties.

The present petitioner, being the opposite party in the

said maintenance case challenged the judgment passed by

the learned Magistrate by filing a criminal revision before the

learned Assistant Sessions Judge at Hooghly.

The said revision was disposed of by the learned

Additional Sessions Judge, 2nd Court at Hooghly by an order

dated August 20, 2003 directing the present petitioner to pay

maintenance @ Rs. 1000/- per month to the opposite party

no. 1 and @ Rs. 750/- per month to the younger daughter of

the parties.

It is further contended by the petitioner/husband that

he subsequently preferred an application under Section 127

of the Code of Criminal Procedure with appropriate relief

stating inter alia that the divorced wife of the petitioner is

not entitled to get any maintenance from the petitioner and

their daughter is also not entitled to get any maintenance as

she in the meantime attained majority and has been given

marriage.

The said application under Section 127 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure was disposed of by the learned Judicial

Magistrate, 3rd Court at Serampore by an order dated

February 22, 2014 in Misc. Case No. 22 of 2011.

The learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court at

Serampore disposed of the said application under Section

127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure holding inter alia that

the opposite party/divorced wife and her daughter are not

entitled to get any maintenance.

Under this backdrop, the petitioner has challenged the

maintainability of the Misc. Execution Case No. 49 of 2010

and Misc. Execution Case No. 29 of 2006 under the

provision of Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The petitioner has appeared in person. The opposite

party no. 1/wife remains unrepresented.

I have perused the order dated February 26, 2014

passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court at

Serampore in Misc. Case No. 22 of 2011 arising out of an

application under Section 127 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure filed by the present petitioner.

The said proceeding was disposed of holding, inter

alia, that the petitioner is not obliged to pay any

maintenance allowance to the opposite party for herself and

her daughter.

The aforesaid order dated February 26, 2014 have

reached its finality.

In view of such circumstances, the learned Judicial

Magistrate, 3rd Court at Serampore is under obligation to

consider as to whether the Misc. Execution Case No. 29 of

2006 and Misc. Execution Case No. 49 of 2010 are at

maintainable or not.

In view of such circumstances, the instant revision is

disposed of by giving liberty to the petitioner to file an

appropriate application before the learned Judicial

Magistrate, 3rd Court at Serampore, Hooghly challenging the

maintainability of the aforesaid two misc. execution cases. If

such application is filed by the petitioner, the learned

Judicial Magistrate, 3rd Court at Serampore, Hooghly, shall

dispose of the said application within four weeks from the

date of receipt of such application by passing a reasoned

order.

The instant revision is accordingly disposed of with the

above directions.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order

duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Bibek Chaudhuri, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter