Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 5648 Cal
Judgement Date : 18 August, 2022
18.08.2022
Sl. No.663
ap
W.P.A. 12463 of 2022
Sarapan Bibi
-Vs-
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Tamal Taru Panda.
... ... for the petitioner
Mr. Mihir Kundu
....for the State.
Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept with
the record.
The petitioner's husband was an 'Assistant
Teacher' of a High School, who retired on 31.05.2009 and
died on 02.11.2019. The first pension payment order was
issued on 26.08.2009. Under the ROPA Rules, 2009 there
was revision of the pensionary and gratuity amount
payable to the petitioner. The revised pension payment
order was issued on 12.04.2012 and the revised arrear
pension was disbursed on 19.07.2012 in terms of ROPA,
209. The petitioner claims interest on delayed payment of
the revised arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557
(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied
upon the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of
India vs. Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on
the issue of limitation relating to payment or refixation of
2
pay or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that relief
may be granted in spite of delay as it does not affect the
rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the learned
Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of Pension,
Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government of
West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to
pay interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the
revised arrear pension calculated on and from 01.06.2009
till the date of actual payment. Such payment is to be
made within a period of eight weeks from the date of
communication of this order.
With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called for,
the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!