Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 1499 Cal/2
Judgement Date : 26 April, 2022
ORDER OD-1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA
ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL SIDE
RVWO/6/2022
AP/374/2020
IA NO: GA/1/2022; GA/2/2022
M/S. HINDUSTAN BUILDERS
VERSUS
IRCON INTERNATIONAL LTD.
BEFORE:
THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA
DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2022
APPEARANCE:
Mr. Sauvik Nandy, Advocate
...for the applicant
Mr. Raghunath Ghose, Advocate
Ms. Sebanti Roy, Advocate
...for the respondent
The Court:- There is a delay of 24 days in filing the review petition.
Hence, GA/1/2022 has been filed seeking condonation of delay. After hearing
the learned counsel for the parties and on perusing the application, I am
satisfied that the delay has been sufficiently explained and hence a ground is
made out to condone the same. Accordingly, GA/1/2022 is allowed and delay
in filing the review petition is condoned.
Heard on merit. This review petition has been filed by the applicant
in AP No.374 of 2020 which has been dismissed by this court by order dated
28.1.2022.
The review has been sought on the limited ground that this Court
while dismissing AP No.374 of 2020 had placed reliance upon the judgment of
the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of United India Insurance Company
Limited vs. Antique Art Exports Private Limited, reported in (2019) 5 SCC 362
but the said judgment was overruled by the subsequent judgment of the
Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Mayavati Trading Private Limited vs.
Pradyuat Deb Burman, reported in (2019) 8 SCC 714.
Paragraph 11 of the judgment in the case of Mayavati (Supra)
clearly states that the judgment in the case of Antique Art Export (Supra) was
overruled as it did not lay down the correct law.
In the order dated 28.1.2022 this Court had placed reliance upon
the judgement of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the matter of Antique Art
Export (Supra). Judgment in the case of Mayavati (Supra) was not brought to
the notice of the Court when the order under review dated 28.1.2022 was
passed, hence an error apparent on the face of the record has been crept,
which furnishes a ground for review/recall of the order.
Having regard to the aforesaid, the review petition is allowed and
the order dated 28.1.2022 passed in AP No.374 of 2020 is recalled. AP No.374
of 2020 is restored to its original position with direction to list the same
expeditiously before the appropriate Bench as per roster.
(PRAKASH SHRIVASTAVA, C.J.)
sm/akg
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!