Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4827 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 September, 2021
21 14.09.2021
rrc
CRR 1781 of 2021 In re : An application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
In the matter of : Avneet Bedi ..... petitioner Mr. Ayan Bhattacharjee Mr. Adil Rashid Mr. Supratim Goon .....For the petitioner
It is submitted by the learned advocate for the petitioner,
that the complaint in the present case under Section 138 of the
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, has been filed by the power of
attorney holder.
The plain reading of the complaint does not disclose that the
power of attorney holder had witnessed the relevant transaction
as an agent of the petitioner company in due course or process
and he had specific knowledge regarding the same.
It further appears that the petitioner is residing outside the
jurisdiction of the learned Magistrate in the Court below and the
process has been issued without a preliminary enquiry.
Prima facie, I am of the opinion that the complaint is not
maintainable in view of the judgment reported at (2014) 11 SCC
790 (A. C. Narayan Vs. State of Maharashtra and another).
In view of the aforesaid, there shall be a stay of all further
proceedings of Complaint Case No. 36041 of 2010 under Sections
138/141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before
the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, 8th Court at Kolkata, for a
period of eight weeks from date.
The petitioner shall serve a copy of this application upon the
opposite parties within a period of two weeks, intimating that
this application be taken up for hearing under the heading
"Contested Application" and shall file an affidavit-of-service to
that effect on the next date of hearing.
List this application after six weeks under the heading
"Contested Application".
(Kausik Chanda, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!