Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

26 2021 Motishree Devi Prasad & Anr vs 3 National Insurance Co. Ltd
2021 Latest Caselaw 4768 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4768 Cal
Judgement Date : 13 September, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
26 2021 Motishree Devi Prasad & Anr vs 3 National Insurance Co. Ltd on 13 September, 2021
Ct.
No.   13.9                    F.M.A.T. 374 of 2015
26    2021                    Motishree Devi Prasad & Anr.
                                           Vs.
 3                             National Insurance Co. Ltd.
akb                             ( Via Video Conference )

             Mr. Ali Imam Shah
             Mr. Sk Abbasuddin         ...For the Appellants/Claimants

             Mr. Deb Naraya Ray        ...For the Respondent/Insurance Co.

The appeal is directed against the judgment and award dated January 27, 2015 passed by the learned Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track 2nd Court, Burdwan, in M.A.C. Case No. 83 of 2013.

The claim application was filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The learned Counsel for the appellants/claimants submits that the learned Tribunal committed an error in law while assessing the income of the deceased at Rs. 15,000/- per annum instead of Rs. 36,000/-. He further submits that the learned Tribunal committed an error in law while holding general damages as Rs. 5,000/- instead of Rs.30,000/-.

In reply, Mr. Deb Narayan Ray, learned Counsel for the respondent/Insurance Company submits that the award passed by the learned Tribunal is absolutely just and proper and there is no scope of interference and/or modification of the award.

Considering the decisions of the Hon'ble Apex Court in cases of Smt. Sarala Verma & Ors. -Vs.- Delhi Transport Corporation & Anr., reported in (2009) 6 SCC 121 and in the

case of National Insurance Company Limited -Vs.- Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017) 16 SCC 680, since the accident

occurred in the year 2013, in a claim under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 an amount of Rs.3,000/- per

does not appear to be exorbitant. Appellants are also justified in praying for income Rs. 3,000/- per month and the general damages shall be Rs. 30,000/- instead of Rs. 5,000/-. Accordingly, the impugned award is modified and recalculated in the manner as stated hereinafter :

      Monthly income                          Rs.     3,000/-
      Annual Income                           Rs.    36,000/-
      50% deduction for personal Expenses     Rs.    18,000/-
      Use Multiplier (15) (18,000 X 15)       Rs. 2,70,000/-

      Add: General Damages                    Rs.    30,000/-

      Just & Total Compensation               Rs. 3,00,000/-

      Less: Awarded sum already paid          Rs. 1,55,000/-

      Enhanced sum                            RS. 1,45,000/-



Mr. Shah acknowledges that the appellants / claimants received the entire awarded sum of Rs.1,55,000/- along with interest in terms of the direction of the learned Tribunal. Accordingly, the balance enhanced sum of Rs.1,45,200/- would become payable to the appellants/claimants by the respondent Insurance Company together with interest assessed @ 6% per annum on and from the date of filing of the claim application till the date of payment.

The respondent Insurance Company is hereby directed to pay Rs.1,45,200/- with 6% interest per annum on and from the date of filing of the claim application till the payment to be made directly to the bank account of the appellants/claimants within a period of 45 days from date.

It is made clear that all the payments shall be made through NEFT/RTGS to the bank accounts of the

appellants/claimants and for such purpose the Counsel for the appellants/claimants shall furnish bank accounts particulars of the appellants/claimants to the Counsel for the Insurance Company within two weeks.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is disposed of.

In view of disposal of the appeal, connected application, if any, is also disposed of. The concerned Department is directed to trace out the application and tag the same with this appeal.

There shall be no further order as to costs. LCR, if any, may be returned back to the Court below.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all formalities, on priority basis.

( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter