Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 2465 Cal
Judgement Date : 26 March, 2021
Ct.
No. 26.03 W.P.A. 3229 of 2020
26 2021 Sovana Rani Pal Samanta & Ors.
Vs.
77 The State of West Bengal & Ors.
akb
Mr. Tamal Taru Panda ...For the Petitioners
1. Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept
with the record.
2. The husband of the petitioner No. 1 was an
Assistant Teacher of a High School, who died-in-harness on
16.01.2017. The petitioner No. 1 had completed all pension
related formalities immediately after the death of her
husband. However, the concerned authorities delayed and
released his gratuity amount on 12.7.2018. The petitioners
herein seek interest to be paid on the gratuity amount for the
interim period of delay in receipt of the gratuity amount.
3. There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
4. The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.
17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon
the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs.
Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of
limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted
in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third
party.
2
5. In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of
Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government
of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity
amount calculated from 17.01.02.2017 till the date of actual
payment. Such payment is to be made within a period of
eight weeks from the date of communication of this order.
6. With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.
7. Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.
8. There will be no order as to costs.
9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.
( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!