Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1813 Cal
Judgement Date : 9 March, 2021
09.03.2021
Ct. No.9
S/L No.1&2
KS
R.V.W. 107 of 2020
With
IA No. CAN 1 of 2021
+
IA No. CAN 2 of 2021
Suka Jagannath Rao
-Vs.-
Smt. Rina Dey
With
S.A. 135 of 2017 (Not Found)
With
IA No. CAN 3 of 2015 (Old No. CAN 7699 of 2015)[Not Found]
+
IA No. CAN 6 of 2017 (Old No. CAN 2545 of 2017)[Not Found]
(Via Video Conference)
Mr. Haradhan Banerjee
Mr. Amitava Pain
Mr. Subhrangshu Dutta
.....For the Appellant (S.A. 135 of 2017)
Mr. Haradhan Banerjee
Mr. Amitava Pain
Mr. Subhrangshu Dutta
.....For the O.P. (R.V.W. 107 of 2020)
Ms. Baisali Ghoshal
.....For the Appellant (R.V.W. 107 of 2020)
Ms. Baisali Ghoshal
.....For the Respondent (S.A. 135 of 2017)
Ms. Baisali Ghoshal, learned advocate appearing for
the review petitioner files written instruction from his client,
Suka Jagannath Rao and submits that the review petitioner is
not willing to proceed with the matter. The written instruction
be kept on record.
Having heard learned advocates for both the parties, it
would appear from the report of Additional Stamp Reporters
dated 08.01.2021, regarding the sufficiency of the C.F.S.
would be furnished on receipt of the certified copy of the
judgment.
Since, the review petitioner is not pressing the review
application and submits for withdrawal of the case, the
review application being, R.V.W. 107 of 2020 and all other
connected applications being, IA No. CAN 1 of 2021 and IA
No. CAN 2 of 2021 are allowed to be withdrawn and treated
as dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Shivakant Prasad, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!