Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

In Re : Faruk Mondal vs State Of Bihar
2021 Latest Caselaw 3130 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3130 Cal
Judgement Date : 3 June, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
In Re : Faruk Mondal vs State Of Bihar on 3 June, 2021

03.06.2021 Court No.28

Avijit Mitra CRM 1304 of 2020 (Via video Conference) + CRAN 1 of 2020

In Re:- An application for bail under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure ;

And In Re : Faruk Mondal Petitioner Mr. Pratip Mukherjee For the Petitioner Mr. N. Ahmed, Md. Anwar Hossain, Ms. Sreyashee Biswas For the State

The present application under Section 439 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the petitioner in

connection with Hanskhali Police Station Case No. 381 of 2017

dated 09.12.2017 under sections 489B/489C of the Indian Penal

Code.

Mr. Mukherjee, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner

submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated alleging

that fake currency notes of a total amount of Rs. 10,500/- had

been recovered from his possession. Though chargesheet has been

submitted and charges have been framed there had been no

progress thereafter and the petitioner is languishing in custody

since 09th December, 2017. He further submits that out of total

seven witnesses none have been examined till date. Drawing the

attention of this Court to the earlier order passed in the present

application, he submits that the investigating agency was directed

to submit a report initially on 6th February, 2020 but the same

had not been filed till date.

Mr. Ahmed, learned advocate appearing for the State opposes

the petitioner's prayer and submits that the delay which had

occasioned is not totally attributable to the State. In view of the

nature of offence the petitioner is not entitled to any relief as

prayed for in the present application.

We have heard the learned advocates appearing for the

respective parties and considered the materials in the case diary.

From the sequence of facts it appears that the petitioner cannot be

held responsible for the delay which has occasioned. The

petitioner is languishing in custody since 09 th December, 2017

and there is no possibility towards early conclusion of trial. Article

21 of the Constitution creates a right in favour of the accused to

be tried speedily and long delay may be taken as presumptive

proof of prejudice [See the judgments delivered in the cases of

Hussainara Khatoon - Vs- State of Bihar, Patna, reported in (1980)

1 SCC 81 and Abdul Rehman Antulay & Ors. -Vs- R.S. Nayak &

Anr., reported in (1992) 1 SCC 225].

In the present pandemic situation and the rapid proliferation

of the virus, bail prayer needs to be considered liberally [See the

order passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Re: Contagion of

Covid-19 Virus in Prisons].

Applying the proposition of law to the facts of the present

case, we are of the opinion that further detention of the petitioner,

who is in custody since 09th December, 2017, is not warranted in

the facts and circumstances of the present case.

Accordingly, we direct that the petitioner, namely, Faruk

Mondal, shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.

10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom

must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional District

and Sessions Judge at Ranaghat, Nadia on condition that the

petitioner shall reside within the jurisdiction of Hanskhali Police

Station and shall meet with the Officer-in-Charge of Hanskhali

Police Station once a fortnight until further orders.

He shall also attend the learned Trial Court on all the dates,

as specified for hearing.

It is further directed that the petitioner shall not tamper with

the evidence or intimidate the witnesses.

In the event he fails to comply with the aforesaid directions,

without any justifiable cause, the learned Court below shall be at

liberty to cancel his bail, in accordance with law, without further

reference to this Court.

With the aforesaid observations, the application for bail,

being CRM No. 1304 of 2020 and connected application being

CRAN 1 of 2020, are disposed of.

All parties shall act on the server copies of this order duly

downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Shampa Sarkar, J) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter