Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 4017 Cal
Judgement Date : 30 July, 2021
Dl. July 30,
18. 2021
Through Video Conference
W.P.S.T. 68 of 2018
It appears that on August 17, 2016 the tribunal had
observed that the order dated August 16, 2016 was not signed by
the members of the tribunal as it appears to have slipped in the mind
of the tribunal that the issue whether a dependent of an ex-employee
served in the work-charged establishment is entitled to
compassionate appointment and the said issue appears to have been
pending before this court. It further appears that in the orders under
challenge in the present writ petition reference was made to the
order dated August 16, 2016 and not to the subsequent order.
On such issue a co-ordinate bench of this court
restrained implementation of the orders dated February 21, 2018
and May 3, 2018 till disposal of the writ petition.
The State is not represented. The writ petition relates to
a claim for compassionate appointment. The matter requires urgent
attention.
Ms. Ankita Dey, learned advocate, appears and prays
for an adjournment on behalf of the learned advocate for the State.
Let this matter be listed on August 17, 2021. On the
adjourned date, the State must produce before us the matter in
which apparently a division bench of this court had the occasion to
consider the similar issue. The judgment of the division bench on
such issue shall be produced before us on the adjourned date.
Ms. Ankita Dey, learned advocate, is directed to
2
communicate this order to Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, learned
advocate representing the respondent no. 1 in the proceeding, within
one week from date.
( Soumen Sen, J. )
( Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J. ) dns
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!