Tanjina Jasmin vs The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 3831 Cal

16. 07 . 2021

     BP                            WPA 9996 of 2021
 UNLISTED
Court No. 17                       (Via Video Conference)

                                   Tanjina Jasmin
                                          Vs.
                              The State of West Bengal & Ors.


                      Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta
                      Mr. Saikat Sutradhar
                      Mr. Bikram Banerjee
                                 ..for the petitioner.


                      Mr. L.K. Gupta, Senior Advocate
                      Mr. Subir Sanyal
                      Mr. Ratul Biswas
                                 ..for the Board.


                          This matter being WPA 996 of 2021 has been

                taken out of turn on mentioning and it is treated as on

                the day's list.

                      It has been mentioned today by the learned

                advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sudipta Dasgupta that

                in the second paragraph of the first page in the

                judgment     and    order dated    14th July, 2021,   the

                application number of the petitioner has been wrongly

                printed which is a typographical error and which is

                required to be corrected. According to the learned

                advocate for the petitioner and also from page 28 of the

                writ application it is found that the application number

                should be 2000024602 and not 200024602.
                        2




         Hence in the presence of the learned advocate for

the West Bengal Board of Primary Education Mr. Ratul

Biswas, I rectify the typographical mistake in the

following manner.

         The first two lines of the first page of the said

order dated 14th July, 2021 would be like this:-

         "She uploaded her particulars like application

number being 2000024602, Roll No. of TET - 2014

examination being No. 090046419, date of birth dated

20.05.1977

etc."

The above lines which actually rectifies the

application number of the petitioner is to be read in the

place of the rectified second paragraph of the said

order.

This order has to be treated as a part of the order

dated 14th July, 2021.

(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. )