Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3806 Cal
Judgement Date : 15 July, 2021
12 15.07.2021 (Via Video Conference)
Sc
F.M.A 353 OF 2021
--------------
Pushpa Jana & Ors.
-Vs.-
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
Mr. Subhankar Mandal ...For the Appellants/ Claimants Mr. Parimal Kumar Pahari ...For the Respondent/ Insurance Co.
The appeal filed by the claimants is against the
Judgment and award dated December 11, 2019, passed
by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, 7th Court,
Paschim Medinipur in M.A.C. Case No. 96 of 2014 in a
claim under section 166 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988
for the accidental death of one Nepal Jana on June 11,
2013, who left behind his widow, son & daughter.
The facts of the case are not in dispute.
The insurance company is represented.
The claim was filed under Section 166 of the Motor
Vehicles Act, 1988. Counsel appearing for the
appellants/claimants submits that the tribunal assessed
the principal compensation at Rs.8,47,687/ but
committed error in granting only Rs.6,00,000/ on the
ground that the claimants had restricted their claim to
Rs.6,00,000/ in the claim application. In the case of
Nagappa -Vs- Gurdayal Singh reported in (2003) 2 SCC
274 Hon'ble Apex Court held that it is the duty of the
Court to pay just compensation after considering
materials on record irrespective of claim amount as
mentioned in the claim application.
Accordingly, considering the judgment of Hon'ble
Apex Court as referred above, award passed by the court
below, is modified and the compensation amount is fixed
at Rs 8,47,687/-.
The appellants submit that they have received the
awarded amount of Rs.6,00,000/ along with interest from
the insurance company. Therefore, balance amount of Rs.
2,47,687/ shall be paid by the respondent insurance
company along with interest @6% per annum to be
calculated from the date of filing of the claim application
till payment to the appellants/claimants within thirty
days of receipt of particulars of their bank accounts, to be
supplied by their counsel to the counsel for the insurance
company.
It is made clear that the payments shall be made
by NEFT/ RTGS in the proportion as ordered by the Court
below.
With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is
disposed of.
In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected
applications, if any, are also disposed of. The department
concerned is directed to tag the applications, if any, with
the main appeal.
There will be no order as to costs.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if
applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all
formalities, on priority basis.
(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!