Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3706 Cal
Judgement Date : 12 July, 2021
12.07.2021 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Item No.10 CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION Ct.No.34 dc.
C.R.R. 2030 of 2014 (Via Video Conference)
Sri Anindo Banerjee versus Smt Poulami Banerjee
In Re: An Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
The present petitioner being husband was aggrieved by
the judgment and order dated 31.03.2014 passed by the
learned Additional Sessions Judge, 9th Court, Alipore in
Criminal Motion No. 462/2013. Records reflect that the
learned Sessions Judge being the revisional court was
pleased to dismiss the revisional application. It has been
categorically observed by the learned sessions court that the
learned Magistrate heard and disposed of the application for
interim maintenance without affording any opportunity to the
present petitioner and the reasons so assigned that none
represented the present petitioner before the learned
Magistrate in spite of the matter being called at 11.15 a.m.
and 12.45 p.m.
Having regard to the fact that during the pendency of
the main application by way of an interim measure, the
learned Magistrate was pleased to allow maintenance, I am of
the view that if the petitioner is aggrieved, he will have an
opportunity to adduce evidence and rebut the contentions of
the opposite party/wife in course of trial. As such, there is no
reason to interfere with the order so passed either by the
learned sessions court or by the learned Magistrate.
Accordingly, CRR 2030 of 2014 is dismissed.
Interim order, if any, is hereby vacated.
All pending applications, if any, are consequently
disposed of.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order
duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!