Thursday, 14, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Kalpana Jana & Ors vs Bajal Allianz General Insurance ...
2021 Latest Caselaw 3592 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 3592 Cal
Judgement Date : 6 July, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
Kalpana Jana & Ors vs Bajal Allianz General Insurance ... on 6 July, 2021
06.07.2021
  ss
                                    F.M.A.T. 246 of 2020
                                        I.A. CAN 1 of 2021
                                      ( Via Video Conference )

                                       Kalpana Jana & ors.
                                               Vs.
                         Bajal Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. & anr.


                   Mr. Pingal Bhattacharya
                   Mrs. Poonam Keswani     ...For the Appellants/claimants

                   Ms. Sucharita Paul
                               ... For the respondent No.1/Insurance Co.

CAN 1 of 2021

Since the original application is not found in the

file, the scanned copy of the application for condonation

of delay is taken on record and the same be treated as

original.

On perusal of the pleadings, this Court is satisfied

that the cause shown for delay in filing of the appeal is

sufficient and prayer for condonation of delay should be

allowed.

Accordingly, the application for condonation of

delay stands allowed.

By consent of the parties, the instant appeal is

treated as on day's list and is taken up for hearing.

The department is directed to issue F.M.A. number

immediately.

FMAT 246 of 2020

The appeal is directed against the judgment and

award dated January 25, 2019 passed by the Learned

Judge, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Fast Track, 1st

Court, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur, in M.A.C Case No. 364

of 2013, on a claim under Section 166 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988.

The claimants submit that the tribunal erred in not

awarding future prospect on the income of the deceased

and adequate amount under the collective heads of

general damages. In view of the law as it stands now,

after the judgments delivered by the Hon'ble Supreme

Court in the case of National Insurance Company Ltd.

Vs. Pranay Sethi & Ors., reported in (2017) 16 SCC

680, the claimants are entitled to 10% as future

prospects and a total sum of Rs.30,000/- under non

pecuniary expenses.

The Insurance Company is represented.

This Court is inclined to accept the submissions

made on behalf of the appellants. Accordingly, the

impugned award is modified and recalculated and the

claimants are found entitled to a total amount of

Rs.5,27,600/- together with interest thereon at the rate of

6% per annum from the date of lodging the claim till the

receipt of payment as indicated more fully hereafter.

The monthly income of the victim is taken to be

Rs.48,000/- per annum. Upon adding 10% as future

prospect and deducting 1/3rd as personal expenses, it is

the figure of Rs.35,200/- on which a multiplier of 13

would be applied. Thus, the net pecuniary compensation

comes to Rs.4,57,600/-. The claimants are also entitled to

Rs.70,000/- on account of loss of estate and funeral

expenses, taking the gross compensation to

Rs.5,27,600/- together with interest thereon at the rate of

6% per annum from the date of lodging the claim till the

date of receipt of the amount.

The claimants acknowledge receipt of the entire

awarded amount along with interest. The balance sum of

Rs.66,600/- would become payable to the appellants

together with interest assessed at the rate of 6 per cent

per annum on and from the date of filing of the claim

petition within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt

of the bank account particulars of the appellants.

Advocate for the Appellants will forward the bank account

details of the appellants within a fortnight from date to

Advocate for the insurance company. The payment shall

be made in the proportion decided by the Court below.

With the aforesaid directions the instant appeal is

disposed of.

In view of the disposal of this appeal, connected

applications, if any, are also disposed of. The concerned

Department is directed to tag the applications, if any,

with the main appeal

There will be no order as to costs.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if

applied for, be given to the parties, upon compliance of all

formalities, on priority basis.

(Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter