Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

26 2021 Nidra Rani Das vs 234 The State Of West Bengal & Ors
2021 Latest Caselaw 590 Cal

Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 590 Cal
Judgement Date : 27 January, 2021

Calcutta High Court (Appellete Side)
26 2021 Nidra Rani Das vs 234 The State Of West Bengal & Ors on 27 January, 2021
Ct.
No.   27.01                       W.P.A. 1773 of 2021
26    2021                               Nidra Rani Das
                                               Vs.
234                              The State of West Bengal & Ors.
akb

              Mr. Goutam Kumar Maity             ...For the Petitioner




              1.           Affidavit of service filed in court today is kept
              with the record.

              2.           The husband of the petitioner was an Assistant
              Teacher of a High School, who retired from service on
              30.11.2000 and died on 29.12.2012. The husband of the
              petitioner had completed all pension related formalities.
              However, the concerned authorities delayed and released
              arrear pension amount on 01.8.2005 to the husband of the
              petitioner. The petitioner herein seeks interest to be paid on
              arrear pension amount for the interim period of delay in
              receipt of the same.

              3.           There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
              petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by stating that
              there is no statutory period of limitation and neither parties
              have suffered due to this delay. It is the submission of the
              petitioner that accordingly the petition should be allowed.

              4.           The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P.
              17557 (W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha vs. State of West
              Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate Bench had relied upon
              the Supreme Court judgment in the case of Union of India vs.
              Tarsem Singh, reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of
              limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay or pension
              wherein the Apex Court had held that relief may be granted
              in spite of delay as it does not affect the rights of the third
                           2




party.

5.             In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the parties, I direct the Director of
Pension, Provident Fund and Group Insurance, Government
of West Bengal as also the concerned Treasury Officer to pay
interest to the petitioner @ 8% per annum on the arrear
pension amount calculated from February 01, 2001 till the
date of actual payment. Such payment is to be made within a
period of eight weeks from the date of communication of this
order.

6.             With these observations, the writ petition is
disposed of.

7.             Since, no affidavit-in-opposition has been called
for, the allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have not been admitted by the respondents.

8. There will be no order as to costs.

9. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties, on priority basis.

( Shekhar B. Saraf, J.)

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter