Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 915 Cal
Judgement Date : 4 February, 2021
04.02.2021
srm
C.O. No. 4406 of 2015
Debasish Bandyoopadhyay Vs.
Subhash Saha & Ors.
Mr. Probal Mukherjee, Mr. Saunak Bhattacharya ...for the Petitioner.
Affidavit-of-service is taken on record.
None appears on behalf of the opposite parties.
This revisional application is directed against judgment
and order dated October 8, 2015 passed by the learned
Additional District Judge, 3rd Court at Berhampore in Misc.
Appeal No.61 of 2010. By the judgment impugned before this
Court, the learned lower appellate court reversed the
judgment dated May 10, 2010 passed by the learned Civil
Judge (Junior Division), Additional Court, Berhampore in
Misc. Case No.10 of 2009. The Misc. Case No.10 of 2009 was
instituted by the opposite parties for pre-emption on the
ground of co-sharership. The application for pre-emption was
rejected. Then Misc. Appeal was preferred. The Misc. Appeal
was allowed with a direction upon the pre-emptors/opposite
parties to deposit the consideration money as per the deed of
conveyance being Exhibit 4 along with 10% of the
consideration money less than the amount deposited by them
in the court below, within one month from the date of receipt
of the trial court records by the learned trial Court and on the
deposit being made the right, title and interest in the share of
the plot transferred would vest in the opposite parties.
Mr. Mukherjee, learned Senior Advocate appearing on
behalf of the pre-emptee/petitioner, argues that the application
for pre-emption was not maintainable without depositing the
entire consideration money along with the interest. He further
submits that the application was barred by limitation as the
same was filed beyond one year from the date of knowledge of
the co-sharers of such transfer.
Prima facie it appears that an arguable case has been
made out by the petitioner.
List this matter in the Daily Supplementary Cause List
on March 24, 2021 at 2.00 p.m. under the heading "Hearing".
The learned Advocate-on-record for the petitioner is
directed to serve copies of this revisional application upon the
opposite parties and their learned Advocate appearing in the
learned Court below along with a server copy of this order
within seven days.
Affidavit of service to be filed on the next date of
hearing.
Status quo with regard to the nature character and
possession of the suit property to be maintained by both the
parties for a period of six months or until further orders
whichever is earlier.
(Shampa Sarkar, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!