Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 1396 Cal
Judgement Date : 11 February, 2021
11th February,
2021
(AK)
36
W.P.A. 3571 of 2020
Sri Gopal Sarkar
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Sudipto Maitra
Mr. Manojit Bhattacharyya
Mr. Daipayan Biswas
...For the Petitioner.
Mr. Subhabrata Datta
Mr. Benazir Ahmed
Mr. Debashis Sarkar
...For the State.
When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned
counsel for the respondents submits that a copy of the
minutes of the meeting held by the State Sentence Review
Board had already been handed up previously to court.
It is submitted that there is no requirement for any
further detailed recording of reasons in such Board
meeting under any legal provision.
Learned counsel hands up today a copy of a
notification dated January 24, 2000, pursuant to which
the Board was constituted, and contends that the same
indicates that reports sent by the SP and DM of the
District and CP of Calcutta can also be looked into by the
Board for considering premature release.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that the language of the notification itself makes
it clear that the Review Board shall consider those cases
of premature release which were not recommended by the
SP, District Magistrate and Commissioner of Police,
meaning thereby that such consideration could not be
fettered even by any adverse report by those officials.
Both sides had already been heard at length
previously. Hearing is thus concluded.
The matter is reserved for judgment.
(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!