Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6335 Cal
Judgement Date : 14 December, 2021
14.12.2021
Court No.13
Sl.27
sp W.P.A. No. 18355 of 2021
Greenply Industries Limited & Anr.
Versus
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
(Through Video Conference)
Mr. Saptangsu Basu, Sr. Adv.,
Mr. Kallol Basu,
Mr. Snehashis Sen,
Mr. Abhishek Banerjee,
Ms. Mrinalini Majumdar
...for the petitioners.
Mr. Anirban Ray, ld. G.P.,
Mr. Amal Sen,
Mr. Suman Sengupta
...for the State
Ms. Sutapa Sanyal,
Mr. Debrup Bhattacharya,
Mr. Pradeep Kr. Tulsyan
...for the respondent no.6
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken
on record.
The petitioners are aggrieved that on compulsion
and mistake in law they were paying agricultural tax
in terms of a notification July 24, 2017 issued by the
Government of West Bengal under the West Bengal
Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulations) Act,
1972.
By a judgment and order dated February 17,
2017, passed in WP 7975 (W) of 2007 (Century
Plyboards (India) Ltd. & Anr. vs. The Government of
West Bengal), the levy that was imposed and tax
demanded from the said plywood manufacturer,
terming its product as agricultural produce, was
struck down and set aside by this Court.
The said notification was reintroduced on July
24, 2017 which the petitioners would argue has the
effect of nullifying the aforesaid judgment in the
Century Plyboards (India) Ltd. & Anr (supra).
Ms. Sutapa Sanyal, learned counsel for the
respondent no.6 opposes the prayer of the petitioners
and submits that the said Century Plyboards case,
cannot be applied to the instant proceedings since the
definition of agricultural produce under Section 2(a) of
the Act of 1972 has undergone amendment in the year
2014.
This Court is of the view that in the back drop of
the judgment rendered by a Co-ordinate bench of this
Court in the Century Plyboards case (supra), the
aforesaid amendment, would not have any application.
The issue was considered by several benches of
this Court, inter alia, in WP 3194 (W) of 2018, WP
4560 (W) of 2018 and WP 4563 (W) of 2018 and the
notification has since been stayed.
In that view of the matter, the notification dated
July 24, 2017 shall remain stayed. The petitioners
shall not be obliged to pay any agricultural marketing
tax under the aforesaid circular.
Let affidavit-in-opposition be filed by the
respondent no.6 within a period of six weeks from the
date of communication of a copy of this order. Reply, if
any, be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.
Liberty to mention for hearing after completion
of pleadings.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this
order duly downloaded from the official website of this
Court.
(Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!