Citation : 2021 Latest Caselaw 6179 Cal
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2021
Ct. 05
Item No.40
07.12.2021
(suvendu)
WPA 18958 of 2021
[Via Video Conference]
Debasis Banerjee
Vs.
The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Biswajit Mal
...........for the petitioner
Ms. Tapati Samanta
............for the respondent no. 4
Affidavit of service filed in Court today is
kept with the record.
The petitioner was an approved Librarian
who retired from service on 30.11.2019. The
petitioner had completed all pension-related
formalities. However, the concerned authorities
delayed and released the gratuity amount and
arrear pension amount on 16.01.2021. The
petitioner herein seeks interest to be paid on the
gratuity amount and arrear pension amount for
the interim period of delay in receipt of the
gratuity amount and arrear pension amount.
There is a considerable delay in filing of the writ
petition, which the petitioner seeks to justify by
stating that there is no statutory period of
limitation and neither parties have suffered due to
this delay. It is the submission of the petitioner
that accordingly the petition should be allowed.
The petitioner relies upon an order in W.P. 17557
(W) of 2017 (Narayan Chandra Saha Vs. State of
West Bengal & Ors.) wherein a co-ordinate bench
had relied upon the Supreme Court judgment in
the case of Union of India Vs. Tarsem Singh,
reported in (2008) 8 SCC 648 on the issue of
limitation relating to payment or refixation of pay
or pension wherein the Apex Court had held that
relief may be granted inspite of delay as it does not
affect the rights of the third party.
In view of the above and after hearing the
learned Counsel for the petitioner, I direct the
Director of Pension, Provident Fund and Group
Insurance, Government of West Bengal as also the
concerned Treasury Officer to pay interest to the
petitioner @ 8% per annum on the gratuity
amount and arrear pension amount calculated
from 01.12.2019 till the date of payment. Such
payment is to be made within a period of eight
weeks from the date of communication of this
order.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed
of without any order as to costs.
Since no affidavit is called for, the
allegations made in the writ petition are deemed to
have been denied.
(Moushumi Bhattacharya, J.)
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!